iRubric: PA Reading Assessment Scoring Guidelines with conventions rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

PA Reading Assessment Scoring Guidelines with conventions

PA Reading Assessment Scoring Guidelines

A short form rubric for grading open ended responses to text generated questions.

Rubric Code: N897AC

By dsienicki

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Reading

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Reading Response Scoring Guidelines
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Retate Task	Poor Restate was copied. Restate did not reflect task, or was incomplete.	Fair Restate was vague, but did included key words to show some understanding of the task.	Good Restate was written in own words, and demonstrated understanding of the task	Excellent Restate was well written, and demonstrated complete understanding of the task and number of examples or supporting details required.
Response	Poor The response provides an incomplete answer to the task, e.g., indicating either a misunderstanding of the task or no text-based details.	Fair The response provides a partial answer to the task, e.g., indicates some awareness of the task and at least one text-based detail.	Good The response provides a complete answer to the task, e.g., a statement that offers a correct answer as well as text-based support.	Excellent The response provides a complete answer to the task, e.g., statements that offer correct answer as well as correct number of text-based support requested in task.
Supporting details	Poor The response provides insufficient or inappropriate details or examples that have a major effect on accuracy.	Fair The response attempts to provide sufficient, appropriate details (e.g., naming, describing, explaining, or comparing) or examples; may contain minor inaccuracies.	Good The response provides specific, appropriate and accurate details (e.g., naming, describing, explaining, or comparing) or examples.	Excellent The response provides explicit, thorough, and well developed details (e.g., naming, describing, explaining, or comparing) or examples.
Conventions	Poor Capitals Punctuation Grammatically correct sentences Correct Spelling Does not demonstrate Writing is very difficult to read. Lacks effort use of conventions when writing	Fair Capitals Punctuation Grammatically correct sentences Correct Spelling Not written neatly Lacks effort Difficult to read Several errors	Good Capitals Punctuation Grammatically correct sentences Correct Spelling Written neatly Few errors	Excellent Capitals Punctuation Grammatically correct sentences Correct Spelling Written neatly Mostly error free
Evidence of Prewriting or Planning	Poor Absence of checklist No prewriting evident on scratch paper	Fair Written checklist May or may not have used prewrite Made use of scratch paper	Good Written checklist Evidence of prewrite Made use of scratch paper	Excellent Written checklist Thorough prewrite Made use of scratch paper
Scoring Total	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Reading

Discuss this rubric