iRubric: Political Map and Analyze Rubric (11)

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Political Map and Analyze Rubric (11)

Students will label a map of the countries that slaves where taken from and slaves went to. Also include a key that shows the percentage of slaves that went to different countries and answer questions based on the map. When your map is complete you will need to work on your analyze paper by following the instructions.

Rubric Code: N7C25C

By sdrost

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: 9-12

Political Map Enter rubric description
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Countries Is the student's country labeled correctly?	Poor Countries are not labeled correctly.	Fair 5 or more countries are not labeled correctly.	Good 2-3 countries are not labeled correctly.	Excellent All countries are labeled correctly.
Key Does the student create a correct key representing the items?	Poor Key does not include information needed.	Fair Key only includes 1-2 items and not set up correctly.	Good Key only includes 3-5 items and is mostly set up correctly.	Excellent Key includes all items and is set up correctly.
Questions about Map Did students answer the questions about slavery correctly?	Poor Student did not answer the questions on the map.	Fair Student only partially answers question.	Good Student mostly answers questions, but missed key points.	Excellent Student answered questions correctly and included key points.
Neatness Did student neatly complete map?	Poor Map is not neat.	Fair Map is some what neat.	Good Map is mostly neat.	Excellent Map is very neat and easy to read.
Problem How important are the identified parts?	Poor Parts do not match statement.	Fair some parts identified but may not be important.	Good Most parts are identified.	Excellent All parts are identified correctly.
Conclusion Do the parts consistently support the analysis statement?	Poor Statement is not included.	Fair Connection between the parts and the conclusion is unclear.	Good Basic, obvious connections between parts and the conclusion.	Excellent Sophisticated, in-depth connections between parts and conclusions.