Skip to main content

iRubric: Matrix: The Evaluation of Books rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Matrix: The Evaluation of Books 
Rubric Code: N5X26W
By shibo85
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Categories
  Ideal

4 pts

good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Usability

Ideal

Pathways through the book are very flexible. presents a good degree of student-friendliness, and of teacher friendliness. also has good degree of usefulness of supporting material and aids.
good

Flexible pathways. Has some degree of student and teacher friendliness. The book is useful to some extent.
Fair

Pathways are not flexible but rather fixed and the content does not present friendliness to teachers as well as students. Also there is lack in supporting material.
Poor

Pathways are misleading and poorly constructed. the book is not usable.
Methodology

Ideal

The book presents methods that are appropriate for learners' proficiency and goals.
good

Methods presented are good enough and the learner needs some modifications in order for goals to be met.
Fair

The book's methodology needs some addition that could be taken from other supplementary books.
Poor

Methodology is not well presented and patterns seem ambiguous for teacher and learner.
Design

Ideal

Layout is very attractive. great degree of visual appeal. Easy navigation through the book. Readability of fonts, tables, etc.
good

Layout is good. There is good use of visual appeal. navigation is not hard through the book.
Fair

Layout is not very attractive and reader will not go deep into the book. navigation is not easy.
Poor

Layout is not attractive and makes the reader refrain from going through the book.
Content

Ideal

Perfect degree of authenticity, relevance, and appropriacy of the text genres.
good

good degree of authenticity and text genres are appropriate
Fair

content lacks authenticity and text genres lacks relevance and appropriateness.
Poor

content has no authenticity and text genres are inappropriate and irrelevant.
Interest

Ideal

Readings are of high level of interest and variety of tasks makes reader interested more and more as he goes through the material.
good

Reading are interesting and good use of tasks and other material.
Fair

Reading start with some interest and gets boring as the reader goes deep in the readings.
Poor

Readings are not interesting at do not encourage the reader to spend any time reading the material. Also no variation of tasks are used.
Aims and approach

Ideal

Great degree of correspondence to students' needs and expectations, relevance to course goals and teaching philosophies.
good

Book meets most of the students' needs and material is connected to the aims of the course.
Fair

Book need some modification in order to meet the goals of the course.
Poor

Book does not correspond to the needs of the students and it is irrelevant to the course goals.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243