iRubric: French 2--Artist Project rubric

Biography was interesting and accurate, and student went beyond the basic facts of the author's life. Paper was almost error free. Spelling and punctuation did not effect comprehension. Students offered enough information to paint a vivid picture of the Artist's life. Students displayed a full page of information, single spaced and in a font no bigger than 16pt font, Times New Roman. Margins were no larger in 1" all the way around.

Information and writing style was generally good and accurate. There was a few errors in spelling and puctuation; however, it did not greatly effect comprension. Length fell a bit short; however, students still provided an ample amount of information from which the reader was able to pull out valuable information.

Biography was noticably shorter that the expected length, i.e. half a page typed. Students may not have provided sufficient information; however, all the basics were there. Paper was typed; however, there were more than a few errors in grammar and spelling, and they effected comprehension. Effort could have been improved.

Paper was incomplete and was not typed. Information was inaccurate or insufficient to the reader's complete comprehension of the artist. Paper was littered with errors. Effort could have been improved.

Group effort and effectiveness is very evident! All members are very well versed in their area of studied. Students could elaborate on information with out reading it directly from the board. All group members spoke.

Group worked well as a team. All members did their part and it is evident in their knowledge. Students are able to slightly elaborate about the are studied.

Group could explain only the basics of their project; however, they were not able to elaborate. One or two students did most of the talking. Group participation does not seem as evident. Effort as a team could be improved.

One students seems to have done as the work, this student is doing all of the talking. Project is poorly presented. Information is patchy and uninteresting. Group unity and presentation are lacking. Much to be improved.