iRubric: Group Communication Evaluation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Group Communication Evaluation

Objective: Participate in group conversation, employing proper speaking and listening techniques and avoiding communication barriers. Directions - Self Evaluation: Judge yourself by marking an "X" in the boxes you feel describe your participation in each category. You may write in numbers if you feel you are in-between categories. Explain your rankings.

Rubric Code: MXWB353

By shawnagilbert

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Communication

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Group Communication
	Poor 6 pts	Fair 8 pts	Good 10 pts	EXPLANATIONS (N/A)
Participation	Poor Participated only when prompted by the teacher. Short or vague responses.	Fair Participated in a few topics. Spoke many times. Gave quality feedback, but sometimes prompted by the teacher. Participation enhanced dialogue most of the time.	Good Participated in discussion of most topics. Spoke many times. Gave feedback and asked questions without being prompted by the teacher. Participation enhanced dialogue every time.	EXPLANATIONS
Speaking Technique	Poor Vocal tone was disrespectful at times or lacked assertion or empathy. No emotion behind thoughts. Trouble understanding at times.	Fair Vocal tone was respectful. Used proper assertiveness and empathy most of the time. Mostly understandable rate, diction, and volume. Trouble finding the right words at times.	Good Vocal tone was respectful with proper assertiveness or empathy. Understandable rate, diction, and volume. Word choice enhanced meaning of responses.	EXPLANATIONS
Listening Technique	Poor Listened to others' ideas. Spoke before understanding. Spoke often while others were speaking. Began side conversations or zoned out during conversation.	Fair Listened to others' ideas and opinions. Attempted to grasp meaning before responding. Sometimes misspoke in turn or talked while another was talking.	Good Listened intently to others' ideas and opinions. Grasped full meaning before responding. Asked valid questions and summarized for meaning. Waited for others to finish talking before sharing.	EXPLANATIONS
Non-Verbals	Poor Body language shows disinterest in topics. Gestures were not used. Eye contact is infrequent or uncomfortable. Face is "blank" during responses.	Fair Body language usually showed interest to the the topic. Hand gestures were used at times. Made eye contact often, though sometimes looked away from group. Facial expressions usually matched emotion. Some "appreciation" during responses.	Good Body language showed interest and respect. Used appropriate hand gestures while speaking. Made eye contact with individuals while listening and speaking. Facial expressions enhanced message with emotion. Expressions and actions showed "appreciation" during others' responses.	EXPLANATIONS
Quality of Conversation	Poor Communication was forced and only to get the grade. Responses were short and vague.	Fair Communication was thoughtful and honest. Responses were supported with some detail. Sometimes responses were misguided or veered off-topic.	Good Communication was thoughtful and honest. Took time to think when needed. Responses were fully supported with detail. Continued to participate throughout the topic.	EXPLANATIONS

Subjects:

Communication

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric