iRubric: MS Publisher Poster Grading Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

MS Publisher Poster Grading Rubric

MS Publisher Grading Rubric

This rubric is used to grade MS Publisher Trunk or Treat Poster

Rubric Code: MXB6C9C

By Mom1then3

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Computers

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 6-8

MS Publisher Trunk or Treat Poster
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good Meets the Learning Goal. 5 pts	Very Good 7 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Content	Poor Failed to meet standards, but attempted.	Fair The content presented does not have enough information for its intended audience.	Good The content presented has some of the information necessary or is presented in a way that is confusing.	Very Good The content presented in complete and informative. It is presented in a standard way with some inefficiency.	Excellent The content presented in complete and informative. It is presented in ways that are interesting and an efficient use of space.
Graphics and Pictures	Poor Failed to meet standards. Either no graphics are present or student used copyrighted images.	Fair Graphics do not go with the accompanying text or appear to be randomly chosen.	Good Graphics go well with the text, but there are too few and the publication of the text seems to be heavy.	Very Good Graphics go well with the text, but there are so many that they distract from the text.	Excellent Graphics go well with the text and there is a good mix of text and graphics.
Spelling and Proofreading	Poor More than 5 spelling/ punctuation errors, but attempted.	Fair 4 or 5 spelling/ punctuation errors in the publication.	Good No more than 3 spelling /punctuation errors.	Very Good 1-2 spelling/punctuation errors.	Excellent N0 spelling/punctuation errors.
Attractiveness and Organization	Poor Failed to meet standards, but attempted. Composition is chaotic, unbalanced and does not use white space well.	Fair The publication’s formatting and organization of material are confusing to the reader. Composition is unbalanced and does not use white space well.	Good The publication has well-organized information. Composition is either not balanced or does not use white space well.	Very Good The publication has attractive formatting and well-organized information. Composition is somewhat balanced and uses white space well.	Excellent The publication has exceptionally attractive formatting and well-organized information. Composition is balanced and uses white space well.
Bibliography	Poor Bibliography is not included.	Fair Bibliography is incomplete.	Good Bibliography is incomplete or incorrect, may contain sources to images that are not copyright free, or images not used in the final product.	Very Good Bibliography is complete but contains sources to images that are not copyright free.	Excellent Bibliography is complete and contains sources to copyright free images.