iRubric: Literature Review rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Literature Review

Rubric Code: MX6A6A6

By mkenneylms

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 9-12

Introduction 15 % (1 1/2 - 2 Pages)
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Enter title 20 % Define the general topic, issue or area of concern.	Poor Introduction provides a vague definition that lacks depth or clarity.	Fair Introduction provides an overview of the definition, but without any supporting details.	Good Introduction provides an overview of the definition, but with few supporting details.	Excellent Introduction provides a strong overview of the definition, with meaningful supporting details.
Enter title 40 % Point out trends in the published research in the area or conflicts in the theory, methodology, evidence, and conclusions, or gaps in the research or a new perspective.	Poor Introduction does not point out the trends in current research, is vague and lacks depth or clarity.	Fair Introduction superficially points out the trends in current research, but without any supporting details.	Good Introduction points out the trends in current research, but with few supporting details.	Excellent Introduction strongly points out the trends in current research, with meaningful supporting details.
Enter title 40 % Detail your reasons for reviewing literature on your topic; explain your stance and organizational structure.	Poor Introduction does not provide detailed reasoning or explain the organizational structure, is vague and lacks depth or clarity.	Fair Introduction superficially provides detailed reasoning or explain the organizational structure, but without any supporting details.	Good Introduction provides detailed reasoning and explains the organizational structure, but with few supporting details.	Excellent Introduction strongly provides detailed reasoning and explains the organizational, with meaningful supporting details.
Body 60 % (4-6 Pages)
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Enter Title 15 % Clear method of organization. (Chronological, By publication, Trends, Thematic, Methodological).	Poor Body is not clearly organized.	Fair There is an insubstantial attempt to organize the body.	Good There is a partial attempt to organize the body.	Excellent Body is thoughtfully and clearly organized.
Enter Title 60 % The history or related ideas that have influenced the development of your issue.	Poor Body does not discuss the development of your topic.	Fair Body superficially discusses the development of your topic, but without any supporting details.	Good Body discusses the development of your topic, but with few supporting details.	Excellent Body strongly discusses the development of your topic, with meaningful supporting details.
Enter Title 25 % The current situation in regard to the topic or issue.	Poor Body does not discuss the current situation of the topic, is vague and lacks depth or clarity.	Fair Body superficially provides a discussion of the topic, but without any supporting details.	Good Body provides a discussion of the topic, but with few supporting details.	Excellent Body strongly provides a discussion of the topic, with meaningful supporting details.
Conclusion 25 % (2-3 Pages)
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Enter Title 20 % Summarize the major parts of significant studies and articles but your attention focuses of your position.	Poor Conclusion does not summarize major parts or focus on your position.	Fair Conclusion superficially summarizes major parts and attempts to focus on your position, but without any supporting details.	Good Conclusion summarizes major parts and focuses on your position, but with few supporting details.	Excellent Conclusion strongly summarizes major parts and focuses on your position, with meaningful supporting details.
Enter Title 40 % Evaluate the current thinking on your topic. This may be a place for you to suggest that there are flaws in the research, theories, findings or areas of study.	Poor Conclusion does not evaluate the current thinking on your topic.	Fair Conclusion superficially evaluates the current thinking on your topic, but without any supporting details.	Good Conclusion evaluates the current thinking on your topic, but with few supporting details.	Excellent Conclusion strongly evaluates the current thinking on your topic, with meaningful supporting details.
Enter Title 40 % Conclude by providing insight into relationship between the topic and the focus of your area of interest, study or proposed position on the topic.	Poor Conclusion does not provide a relationship between the topic and your area of study, is vague and lacks depth or clarity.	Fair Conclusion superficially provides a relationship between the topic and your area of study, but without any supporting details.	Good Conclusion provides a relationship between the topic and your area of study, but with few supporting details.	Excellent Conclusion strongly provides a relationship between the topic and your area of study, with meaningful supporting details.
Grammar/mechanics 5 %
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Enter Title 100 %	Poor Ten or more mechanical/grammatical errors are present.	Fair Eight to nine mechanical/grammatical errors are present.	Good Six to seven mechanical/grammatical errors are present.	Excellent Five or fewer mechanical/grammatical errors are present.
Citations 5 %
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Enter Title 100 %	Poor Ten or more with the citation page and in text citations.	Fair Eight to nine with the citation page and in text citations.	Good Six to seven with the citation page and in text citations.	Excellent Five for fewer errors with the citation page and in text citations.

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric