Skip to main content
iRubric: Comparison Media Project rubric

iRubric: Comparison Media Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Comparison Media Project 
Honors Comparison Essay Project
Rubric Code: MX69735
By horng1
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Comparison media
  Poor

0.4 pts

Fair

0.6 pts

Good

0.8 pts

Excellent

1 pts

Introduction/Thesis Stat

20 pts
Poor

Introduction and thesis statement do not introduce both subjects for comparison, or they may not be a complete sentence. No controlling point about the subjects is evident.
Fair

Introduction and thesis statement introduce the subjects for comparison but they do not emphasize the author's point for the comparison or contrast.
Good

Introduction and thesis statement create interest and are fairly well developed. But while they cover both subjects,
they are not very engaging.
Excellent

Very well developed introduction and thesis statement. They engage the reader and create interest. They cover both subjects and the author's point for the comparison.
Body

20 pts
Poor

There are no apparent topic sentences for each section.
Pictures are either wrong or lacking. The details do not fit the author's point for the comparison.
Fair

At least one topic sentence is not clear nor does it relate to the thesis statement.
There are pictures, but they are not clear, specific, and vivid, or both subjects are not given roughly the same amount of space.
Good

Each section contains a topic sentence that relates to the thesis statement.
Pictures are clear and specific, but they do not vividly support the author's point for the comparison.
Excellent

Each section has a clearly focused topic sentence that relates to the thesis statement.
Pictures are clear and specific. The pictures clearly support the author's point for the comparison.
Conclusion

10 pts
Poor

There is no conclusion evident in the project, or the conclusion is not related to the remainder of the project.
Fair

The concluding section makes a point about the subjects for comparison, but it does not unify or "wrap-up" the project effectively.
Good

The concluding section unifies the project around the subjects and the point used for comparison, but it is not very engaging or interesting.
Excellent

The concluding section effectively unifies the project around the subjects and the point used for comparison. It contains an engaging and interesting point about the comparison of the subjects.
Overall Organization

15 pts
Poor

No discernible organization. Pictures are either missing or not in any discernible order.
Fair

The pictures are in a discernible order, but the author does not stick to one pattern in the project, or the pictures do not adequately support the author's controlling point.
Good

The pictures are in a clear order and the author sticks to one pattern. Both subjects are given roughly the same space.
Excellent

The pictures are in a clear effective order and the author sticks to one pattern: subject-by-subject or point-by point. Both subjects are covered vividly and given about the same amount of space.
Style: sentence flow, tone

20 pts
Poor

Writing and picture combination is confusing and hard to follow. Contains fragments and/or run-on sentences. The tone and purpose is inconsistent and difficult to determine.
Fair

Writing and picture combination is clear. The tone is inconsistent and word choice, while adequate, could be better.
Good

Writing and picture combination is clear. There is consistent tone and word choice is appropriate.
Excellent

Writing and picture combination is smooth, skillful, and coherent. Consistent and appropriate tone and word choice is used.
Mechanics

15 pts
Poor

Distracting and major errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. Words are hard to see over pictures.
Fair

A few errors in punctuation, grammar, spelling, and capitalization that. while distracting, the meaning and intent of the project can still be discerned.
Good

A few minor errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization, but they do not detract from the overall meaning and effectiveness of the project.
Excellent

No errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, or capitalization. Wording is visually clear with the pictures.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98