Skip to main content

iRubric: Digital Content Producer rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Digital Content Producer 
Rubric Code: MX39AB5
By Brian_Wiebe
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Digital Content Producer
Enter rubric description
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Quality of Writing
15 %

Poor

- posts have no style or voice

- gives no new information on the topic

- poorly organized
Fair

- posts has little style or voice

- gives some new information on the topic

- poorly organized
Good

- written in a somewhat interesting style and voice

- some new information on the topic or reflective

- well organized
Excellent

- written in an interesting style and voice

- very informative or deeply reflective

- well organized
Presentation
10 %

Poor

- many words misspelled

- many grammar errors

- formatting makes post difficult to follow or read
Fair

- several spelling errors

- several grammar errors

- formatting makes it
difficult to follow or read
Good

- few spelling errors

- few grammar errors

- some formatting to help make the post easier to read
Excellent

- all words spelled correctly

- no grammar errors

- formatting makes the post more interesting and easier to read
Community
30 %

Poor

- no links

- posts are not tagged or categorized

- no multimedia
Fair

- one or more links

- only "easy" links

- post may be categorized or tagged

- one piece of multimedia
Good

- several links included that add to the reader's understanding

- posts may be categorized or tagged

- several pieces of multimedia
Excellent

- several links to places that add to readers understanding

- post is fully categorized and tagged

- multiple pieces of multimedia

- multimedia adds new information or perspective to post
Review
20 %

Poor

- no clear focus; review is rambling and awkward

- lead is neither original and catchy; is boring, overused or trite

- little or no significant
intro; no details about the subject

- contains no significant
evaluation of many aspects of the subject to support reviewer’s opinion
Fair

- review lacks strong sense of unity and focus

- lead is adequate but not extremely catchy or original

- intro is either much too short or much too long; may be vague

- contains insufficient evaluation of many aspects of the subject to support reviewer's opinion
Good

- focus is fairly clear

- lead is appropriate and fairly effective at getting attention, shows some signs of originality

- intro is either a little too long, or not long enough, fewer details about the subject

- contains some evaluation of many aspects of the subject to support reviewer's opinion, including detailed
description
Excellent

- focus of review is clear

- lead is original and gets the reader's attention

- gives a brief introduction
to the subject, with
description of atmosphere
and type

- contains sufficient and knowledgeable evaluation
of many aspects of the subject
to support reviewer’s
opinion, including detailed
description
Events Calendar
10 %

Poor

- events posted are not relevant to Evolution's audience

- posts do not include pertinent details (time, location, contact info, ticket info)
Fair

- four events that are somewhat relevant to Evolution's audience posted daily

- some posts include pertinent details (time, location, contact info, ticket info)
Good

- four events that are important to Evolution's audience posted daily

- most posts include pertinent details (time, location, contact info, ticket info)
Excellent

- four events that are significant to Evolution's audience posted daily

- all posts include pertinent details (time, location, contact info, ticket info)
Podcasts Posted to Website
15 %

Poor

- posts include an unclear introduction to each podcast

- there are no podcasts posted daily on the website
Fair

- posts include a vague introduction to each podcast

- fewer than three podcasts posted daily on the website, in the correct categories, including tags
Good

- posts include an understandable introduction to each podcast

- more than four podcasts posted on the website, in the correct categories, including tags
Excellent

- posts include an articulate and descriptive introduction to each podcast

- all podcasts posted on the website, in the correct categories, including tags




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243