Skip to main content
iRubric: AP Spanish Lit Question #3- Single Text Analysis rubric

iRubric: AP Spanish Lit Question #3- Single Text Analysis rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AP Spanish Lit Question #3- Single Text Analysis 
AP Spanish Literature Single Text Analysis
Rubric Code: M95472
By ElQuisqueyano
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12


Powered by iRubric Single Text Analysis
  Demonstrates Superiority

5 pts

Demonstrates Competence

4 pts

Suggests Competence

3 pts

Suggests Lack of Competence

2 pts

Demonstrates Lack of Competence

1 pts

Period, Movement, Genre, Technique

Demonstrates Superiority

Clearly analyzes how the text represents the characteristics of the Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique.
Demonstrates Competence

Analyzes how the text represents the element Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique.
Suggests Competence

Attempts to analyze how the text represents the Period, Movement, sub-Genre, or Technique.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Shows little ability to analyze how the text represents the Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Inaccurate and insufficient; there is no attempt to analyze how the text represents the specified Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique.
Contextual Knowledge

Demonstrates Superiority

Clearly analyzes how the text represents the cultural context. Analyzes how cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the text reflect the given cultural context.
Demonstrates Competence

Analyzes how the text represents the cultural context. Explains how cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the text relate to the given cultural context.
Suggests Competence

Attempts to analyze how the text represents the cultural context. Identifies cultural products, practices, or perspectives of the given cultural context found in the text.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Shows little ability to analyze how the text represents the cultural context. May not clearly identify cultural products, practices, or perspectives of the given cultural context found in the text.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Inaccurate and insufficient; there is no attempt to analyze how the text represents the cultural context. Demonstrates lack of understanding of the text, or cultural products, practices, or perspectives of given cultural context.
Literary Features

Demonstrates Superiority

Effectively discusses a variety of rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features.
Demonstrates Competence

Discusses rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Suggests Competence

Describes some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Suggests Lack of Competence

May not clearly identify rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

May not identify rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Organization

Demonstrates Superiority

Includes an explicit statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a cohesive and logical progression of ideas in a well-developed response.
Demonstrates Competence

Includes an explicit statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Competence

Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), evidence of organization (a stated topic, and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence

May not clearly state a purpose or be organized around a central idea or argument; progression of ideas may not be logical.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Does not state a purpose, show evidence of organization, or offer a progression of ideas.
Textual Examples

Demonstrates Superiority

Supports analysis by integrating specific, well-chosen textual examples throughout the essay.
Demonstrates Competence

Supports analysis with appropriate textual examples.
Suggests Competence

Elaborates on main points and supports observations by citing examples; however, the examples may not always be clear and relevant.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Presents main points and some details, describes basic elements of the text, but may do so without examples or supporting an argument.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

May consist entirely of summary or paraphrasing of the text without examples relevant to the Movement, Period, (sub-)Genre, or Technique or the given cultural context.
Balance and Focus

Demonstrates Superiority

Response has a clearly balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique.
Demonstrates Competence

Response has a reasonably balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique.
Suggests Competence

Response attempts to have a balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique. If the response has a significantly unbalanced focus, the analysis must be good to achieve this score.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Response has a significantly unbalanced focus on either the text, specified Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique, or the given context.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Demonstrates lack of understanding and has a significantly unbalanced focus on either the text, specified Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique, or the given context.
Language Use- Vocabulary

Demonstrates Superiority

Vocabulary is varied and appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, presents main ideas and supporting details, and communicates some nuances of meaning.
Demonstrates Competence

Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and presents
main ideas and some supporting details.
Suggests Competence

Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, but may be limited to presenting some relevant ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Vocabulary may be inappropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and forces the reader to supply inferences.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Vocabulary is insufficient and inappropriate to the text(s) being discussed; errors render comprehension difficult.
Language Use- Grammar

Demonstrates Superiority

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is very good; use of verb tenses and moods is generally accurate; word order and formation are accurate; use of cohesive devices and transitional elements or both is appropriate to guide understanding.
Demonstrates Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is good; occasional errors in the use of verb tenses and moods do not detract from understanding; word order and formation are mostly accurate.
Suggests Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is adequate; errors in the use of verb tenses and moods may be frequent but do not detract from overall understanding; word order and formation are generally accurate.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is weak; errors in verb forms, word order, and formation are numerous and serious enough to impede comprehension at times.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is inadequate; errors in verb forms, word order, and formation are nearly constant and impede comprehension frequently.
Language Use- Writing Conventions

Demonstrates Superiority

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are generally accurate; paragraphing shows grouping and progression of ideas.
Demonstrates Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are generally accurate; occasional errors do not detract from understanding; paragraphing shows grouping and progression<BR>
of ideas.
Suggests Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are sometimes accurate; numerous errors do not detract from overall understanding; paragraphing shows grouping of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are generally inaccurate; errors are numerous and serious enough to impede comprehension at times; paragraphing may not show grouping of ideas.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are inaccurate; errors are nearly constant and impede comprehension frequently; there may be little or no evidence of paragraphing.



Keywords:
  • spanish literature text analysis


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2023 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202