Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: SCIENCE FAIR rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
SCIENCE FAIR
SCIENCE FAIR
Science Fair Presentation Rubric
Rubric Code:
M2WBX3A
By
heidikoz
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
SCIENCE FAIR PRESENTATION
Poor
0 pts
Fair
1 pts
Good
2 pts
Excellent
3 pts
Question
Poor
Not attempted
Fair
The question is present, but is not testable.
Good
The question that the investigation was designed to answer is testable
Excellent
The question that the investigation was designed to answer is well articulated and testable.
Hypothesis
Poor
Not attempted
Fair
The Hypothesis is present but does not show a relationship between the variables.
Good
The Hypothesis is stated but is not reasonable or only mentions one variable.
Excellent
The Hypothesis is clearly stated and shows a reasonable relationship between the independent variable on the dependent variable
Experiment
Poor
Experiment was below grade level expectations Poor, shows little originality and thought.
Fair
Experiment was too simple, certain areas need improvement.
Good
Experiment was done correctly but lacked difficulty.
Excellent
Experiment show appropriate grade level complexity, is a superior product. Unique and Complex.
Procedure
Poor
Not attempted
Fair
A logical step-by-step procedure is listed, but many steps are missing or incomplete.
Good
A logical step-by-step procedure is listed, but some steps are missing or incomplete.
Excellent
A detailed, logical step-by-step procedure is listed.
Results
Poor
Not attempted
Fair
Data table(s), graph(s), and other representations of data include some of the above components.
Good
Data table(s), graph(s), and other representations of data include most of the above components.
Excellent
Data table(s), graph(s), and other representations of data are accurate, easily understood, and complete including title,
appropriate labels, appropriate placement of variables, and use of correct units of measurement.
Discussion
Poor
Not attempted
Fair
Some parts of discussion are complete and accurate.
Good
Most parts of discussion are complete and accurate.
Excellent
Discussion includes at least three paragraphs that summarize the results in words, describe trends or patterns in the results, and
relate the science knowledge that supports the results.
Conclusion
Poor
Not attempted
Fair
Some parts of conclusion are complete and accurate.
Good
Most parts of conclusion are complete and accurate.
Excellent
Conclusion clearly restates the question and whether the prediction was supported with evidence; includes an explanation that
effectively connects results to scientific knowledge; and also provides suggestions for further investigations.
Creativity
Poor
There is evidence of significant input from adults beyond encouragement and assistance in obtaining materials.
Fair
There is evidence of some input from adults beyond encouragement and assistance in obtaining materials.
Good
Project is mostly the original creative work of the student researcher.
Excellent
Project is clearly the original creative work of the student researcher. Input into the project by adults is limited.
Site
Poor
Display is difficult to read, poorly organized, and visual components, such as graphics or color, are missing or distracting.
Fair
One out the three qualities listed above is present.
Good
Two out the three qualities listed above are present.
Excellent
Web Site is easy to read and well-organized. Color, graphics, and other visual components add to the display, layout is followed.
Oral Presentation
Poor
Communication was not effective.
Fair
One out of the four qualities listed above is present.
Good
Two out of the four qualities listed above are present.
Excellent
Effective communication of scientific concepts, design principles, data analysis, and further studies.
Background Information
Poor
Not attempted
Fair
Inadequate information. One source cited – Not in MLA format
Good
Minimal information provided. Two Sources Cited – Some MLA format errors
Excellent
Sources and information are relevant and research informs the reader about needed definitions, concepts, and pertinent scientific
information. Three sources cited using MLA format.
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.