Skip to main content
iRubric: SCIENCE FAIR rubric

iRubric: SCIENCE FAIR rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
SCIENCE FAIR 
SCIENCE FAIR
Science Fair Presentation Rubric
Rubric Code: M2WBX3A
By heidikoz
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric SCIENCE FAIR PRESENTATION
  Poor

0 pts

Fair

1 pts

Good

2 pts

Excellent

3 pts

Question

Poor

Not attempted
Fair

The question is present, but is not testable.
Good

The question that the investigation was designed to answer is testable
Excellent

The question that the investigation was designed to answer is well articulated and testable.
Hypothesis

Poor

Not attempted
Fair

The Hypothesis is present but does not show a relationship between the variables.
Good

The Hypothesis is stated but is not reasonable or only mentions one variable.
Excellent

The Hypothesis is clearly stated and shows a reasonable relationship between the independent variable on the dependent variable
Experiment

Poor

Experiment was below grade level expectations Poor, shows little originality and thought.
Fair

Experiment was too simple, certain areas need improvement.
Good

Experiment was done correctly but lacked difficulty.
Excellent

Experiment show appropriate grade level complexity, is a superior product. Unique and Complex.
Procedure

Poor

Not attempted
Fair

A logical step-by-step procedure is listed, but many steps are missing or incomplete.
Good

A logical step-by-step procedure is listed, but some steps are missing or incomplete.
Excellent

A detailed, logical step-by-step procedure is listed.
Results

Poor

Not attempted
Fair

Data table(s), graph(s), and other representations of data include some of the above components.
Good

Data table(s), graph(s), and other representations of data include most of the above components.
Excellent

Data table(s), graph(s), and other representations of data are accurate, easily understood, and complete including title,
appropriate labels, appropriate placement of variables, and use of correct units of measurement.
Discussion

Poor

Not attempted
Fair

Some parts of discussion are complete and accurate.
Good

Most parts of discussion are complete and accurate.
Excellent

Discussion includes at least three paragraphs that summarize the results in words, describe trends or patterns in the results, and
relate the science knowledge that supports the results.
Conclusion

Poor

Not attempted
Fair

Some parts of conclusion are complete and accurate.
Good

Most parts of conclusion are complete and accurate.
Excellent

Conclusion clearly restates the question and whether the prediction was supported with evidence; includes an explanation that
effectively connects results to scientific knowledge; and also provides suggestions for further investigations.
Creativity

Poor

There is evidence of significant input from adults beyond encouragement and assistance in obtaining materials.
Fair

There is evidence of some input from adults beyond encouragement and assistance in obtaining materials.
Good

Project is mostly the original creative work of the student researcher.
Excellent

Project is clearly the original creative work of the student researcher. Input into the project by adults is limited.
Site

Poor

Display is difficult to read, poorly organized, and visual components, such as graphics or color, are missing or distracting.
Fair

One out the three qualities listed above is present.
Good

Two out the three qualities listed above are present.
Excellent

Web Site is easy to read and well-organized. Color, graphics, and other visual components add to the display, layout is followed.
Oral Presentation

Poor

Communication was not effective.
Fair

One out of the four qualities listed above is present.
Good

Two out of the four qualities listed above are present.
Excellent

Effective communication of scientific concepts, design principles, data analysis, and further studies.
Background Information

Poor

Not attempted
Fair

Inadequate information. One source cited – Not in MLA format
Good

Minimal information provided. Two Sources Cited – Some MLA format errors
Excellent

Sources and information are relevant and research informs the reader about needed definitions, concepts, and pertinent scientific
information. Three sources cited using MLA format.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98