Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Chapter Summary and Presentation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Chapter Summary and Presentation Rubric
Chapter Summary and Presentation Rubric
Rubric Code:
M24723X
By
fnichols2318
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
History
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Chapter Written Summary
Unacceptable/Absent
1 pts
Limited/Emerging
2 pts
Proficient
3 pts
Advanced
4 pts
Summary Length
Unacceptable/Absent
Summary was under 250 words
Limited/Emerging
Summary was between 250 and 349 words or over 550 words
Proficient
Summary was either between 350 and 399 words or between 501 and 550 words
Advanced
Summary was 400-500 words in length
Spelling/Punctuation/Grammar
Unacceptable/Absent
The summary contains more than 5 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors
Limited/Emerging
The summary contains 3-5 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors
Proficient
The summary contains 1-2 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors
Advanced
The summary contains no spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors
Identification of Main Points
Unacceptable/Absent
No grasp of any of the main points intended by the author
Limited/Emerging
Only 1-2 main points in the text accurately identified and explained
Proficient
3 main points accurately identified and briefly summarized from the text
Advanced
At least 4 main points identified and briefly summarized from the text
Identification of Questions
Unacceptable/Absent
Does not include insightful questions to be discusses in class
Limited/Emerging
Includes only 1-2 insighful questions that are poorly worded and/or lack depth of insight
Proficient
Includes 3 questions from the text that are poorly worded and/or lack depth of insight
Advanced
Includes at least 3 insigtful questions from the text to be used in class discussion
Student Evaluation of the Chapter
Unacceptable/Absent
Evaluation is not fluid and demonstrates no understanding of the author's perspective
Limited/Emerging
Evalutation is mostly fluid and adequately explained, but demonstrates a lack of understanding of the author's overall perspective
Proficient
Evaluation is fluid, but demonstrates a lack of understanding ofat least one of the author's points
Advanced
Evaluation is fluid, thorough, and demonstrates that the student clearly understand the author's perspective
Christian Theology & History
Unacceptable/Absent
The student demonstrates almost no critical thinking skills regarding the integration of Christian theology and history
Limited/Emerging
Student demonstrates emerging but limited critical thinking skills regarding the integration of Christian theology and history
Proficient
Student demonstrates proficient critical thinking skills through integration of Christian theology and worldview as it relates to history
Advanced
Student demonstrates advanced critical thinking skills thorugh integration of Christian theology and worldview as it relates to history
Evaluation of Class Discussion
Unacceptable/Absent
1 pts
Limited/Emerging
2 pts
Proficient
3 pts
Advanced
4 pts
Length of Discussion
Unacceptable/Absent
Discussion Lasted Less than 15 Minutes
Limited/Emerging
Discussion Ranged from 15-20 Minutes
Proficient
Discussion ranged from 20-25 Minutes
Advanced
Discussion ran for 25+ Minutes
Student Engagement
Unacceptable/Absent
Students were not at all engaged in the class dialogue
Limited/Emerging
Students were only occasionally engaged in the conversation
Proficient
Students were mostly engaged in the conversation, though the dialogue tended to lag at times
Advanced
The presenter kept most students actively engaged in the conversation using insightful and provoking comments and questions
Communication
Unacceptable/Absent
Presenter lacked confidence and did not effectively guide the conversation
Limited/Emerging
Presenter only occasionally demonstrated confidence and struggled to communicate and guide the conversation
Proficient
Presenter demonstrated confidence and communicated clearly for the most part, but occasionally struggled to effectively guide the conversation
Advanced
Presenter demonstrated confidence and communicated with clear articulation, effectively guiding the class through the conversation
Collaboration
Unacceptable/Absent
Partners do not work well together, do not share responsibility to communicate, and cause ensuing confusion for the rest of the class
Limited/Emerging
Partners do not work together very well and do not seem to be on the same page in their efforts to guide the conversation
Proficient
Partners work together well for the most part to effectively guide the conversation, though one partner tends to dominate the conversation
Advanced
Partners work together well to effectively guide the conversation and share the responsibility of communicating equally
Continuity with Written Summary
Unacceptable/Absent
The class discussion was completely unrelated and inconsistent with the written summary
Limited/Emerging
Class discussion had very little to do with the written summary and/or was mostly inconsistent with the content of the summary
Proficient
Class discussion was clearly linked to the written summary, though the presenter displayed some inconsistencies in communication
Advanced
Class discussion was clearly linked to and consistent with the ideas presented in the written summary
Critical Thinking
Unacceptable/Absent
Presenter demonstrated no understanding of or ability to evaluate the chapter
Limited/Emerging
Presenter verbally demonstrated accurate understanding, analysis, and evaluation of only a limited portion of the chapter
Proficient
Presenter verbally demonstrated an understanding, analysis, and evalution of most of the content of the chapter
Advanced
Presenter verbally demonstrated clear and accurate understanding, analysis, and evaluation of the content of the chapter
Connecting Christian Theo & Hist
Unacceptable/Absent
The student demonstrates no understanding of the relationship between Christian Theology and History, nor its relevance today
Limited/Emerging
The student demonstrates only a vague understanding of the relationship between Christian Theology and History and does not show its relevance
Proficient
The student demonstrates an understanding of the relationship between Christian theology and history, but fails to show its relevance for us today
Advanced
The student demonstrates a clear understanding of the relationship between Christian theology and history, and its relavance for us today
Subjects:
History
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More History rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.