Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Qualitative Research Critique Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Qualitative Research Critique Rubric
Qualitative Research Critique Rubric
The student is requested to read a research article and write a critique that is based on an organized framework.
Rubric Code:
M23C783
By
cwelch94
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
ARTICLE SUMMARY AND CRITIQUE
Weak
0 pts
Good
1 pts
N/A
(N/A)
N/A
(N/A)
Article Citation
1 pts
APA format citation the the top of the article critique
Weak
No formal citation has been made. Formal citation has been stated at the beginning of the assignment, but the referencing style is unclear or there are major errors in the citation.
Good
Citation is completely compliant with APA style
N/A
N/A
Introduction & Article Summary
1 pts
Weak
Literature review was not discussed. Variables/research questions were not identified or explained at length. Purpose of the study was not identified.
Good
Variables were identified. Identify the variables and purpose of the study. Discuss whether the literature review of the article provided enough background information to communicate the premise of the study.
N/A
N/A
Critique Framework
Unsatisfactory
0 pts
Weak
1 pts
Satisfactory
1.5 pts
Strong
2 pts
Methods
2 pts
Unsatisfactory
Methods section is not discussed or is simply restated.
Weak
Sample group is described in detail. Steps of the procedure are mentioned.
Satisfactory
Sample, reliability of instruments, and logic for using the instruments is discussed.
Strong
The procedures of the study are discussed (Principle design of the study, source of data, data analysis)
Discussion
2 pts
Unsatisfactory
The student does not reflect on the clinical relevance of the article.
Weak
The student offers weak or inconclusive conclusions about the clinical relevance of the article.
Satisfactory
The student addresses the clinical relevance of the article but does not offer a completely convincing rationale for the clinical use of the evidence or omits the implications for clinical practice.
Strong
The clinical relevance of the article is clearly addressed, the limitations of the study are addressed, a convincing rationale is presented for suggestions for improving the study, and the implications for clinical practice are discussed.
Written Communication
2 pts
Unsatisfactory
The submitted critique demonstrates little or no attention to the use of necessary conventions of writing(spelling, grammar, organization).
Weak
The submitted critique has moderately communicated efficiently in written form. There are some awkward phrases, poor language choices, or spelling and grammar errors.
Satisfactory
The student uses all necessary conventions of writing (spelling, grammar, organization) without error or with few errors. The critique is written an an appropriate professional level.
Strong
The critique is of publishable quality with no grammar or spelling errors. Meets APA standards.
Critique of Article
2 pts
Unsatisfactory
The student does not uses the framework provided to construct a judgement about the article or constructs one that is not consistent with the framework provided or is not supported by the facts contained in the article.
Weak
The student constructs a judgement about the article that has some relationship to the framework provided, however, the specifics (content, organization, conclusions) do not totally relate to the framework. The student is objective overall.
Satisfactory
The student constructs a valid judgement about the article and clearly explains why the judgement is based on the framework provided. Some elements of the framework are omitted when they should be addressed.
Strong
The critique addresses all elements of the framework objectively and offers a complete and clear critique of weak or missing elements.
Keywords:
Research evaluation skills
Subjects:
Computers
Psychology
Education
Nursing
Types:
Assignment
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Computers rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.