Skip to main content

iRubric: AP WH Research Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AP WH Research Project 
Rubric Code: LXW327B
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Research Project
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Needs Revision

1 pts

Thesis, Problem, Question

Excellent

Student(s) posed a thoughtful, creative question that engaged them in challenging or provocative research. The question breaks new ground or contributes to knowledge in a focused, specific area.
Good

Student(s) posed a focused question involving them in challenging research.
Fair

Student(s) constructed a question that lends itself to readily available answers
Needs Revision

Student(s) relied on teacher-generated questions or developed a question requiring little creative thought.
Information Seeking/Sele

Excellent

Student(s) gathered information from a variety of quality electronic and print sources, including appropriate licensed databases. Sources are relevant, balanced and include critical readings relating to the thesis or problem. Primary sources were included (if appropriate).
Good

Student(s) gathered information from a variety of relevant sources--print and electronic
Fair

Student(s) gathered information from a limited range of sources and displayed minimal effort in selecting quality resources
Needs Revision

Student(s) gathered information that lacked relevance, quality, depth and balance.
Analysis

Excellent

Student(s) carefully analyzed the information collected and drew appropriate and inventive conclusions supported by evidence. Voice of the student writer is evident.
Good

Student (s) product shows good effort was made in analyzing the evidence collected
Fair

Student(s) conclusions could be supported by stronger evidence. Level of analysis could have been deeper.
Needs Revision

Student(s) conclusions simply involved restating information. Conclusions were not supported by evidence.
Synthesis

Excellent

Student(s) developed appropriate structure for communicating product, incorporating variety of quality sources. Information is logically and creatively organized with smooth transitions.
Student(s) documented all Student(s) developed appropriate structure for communicating product, incorporating variety of quality sources. Information is logically and creatively organized with smooth transitions.
Good

Student(s) documented sources with some care, Sources are cited, both in-text/in-product and on Works-Cited/Works-Consulted pages/slides. Few errors noted.
Fair

Student(s) need to use greater care in documenting sources. Documentation was poorly constructed or absent.
Needs Revision

Student(s) clearly plagiarized materials.
Product, Process

Excellent

Student(s) effectively and creatively used appropriate communication tools to convey their conclusions and demonstrated thorough, effective research techniques. Product displays creativity and originality.
Good

Student(s) effectively communicated the results of research to the audience.
Fair

Student(s) need to work on communicating more effectively
Needs Revision

Student(s) showed little evidence of thoughtful research. Product does not effectively communicate research findings.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58