Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Debate Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Debate Rubric
Rubric Code:
LXB89W3
By
Shumway
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Debate Rubric
Poor
5 pts
Fair
10 pts
Good
15 pts
Excellent
20 pts
Ethos
Poor
No ethos was established.
Fair
1-2 moments of debate established ethos for the audience.
Good
Several credible sources were referenced and the speaker established ethos within his/her execution.
Excellent
The groups went above and beyond to establish ethos through several sources and appeared credible during their entire execution, establishing ethos which supported the team as a whole.
Pathos
Poor
No pathos was established.
Fair
1-2 moments of debate established pathos for the audience.
Good
Several phrases and techniques were used to pique the audience's emotional interest.
Excellent
The groups went above and beyond to establish pathos through rhetorical questions, the use of "you" or "we", and played on the audiences emotions to evoke sympathy, empathy, and in some cases, effective outrage.
Logos
Poor
No logos was established.
Fair
1-2 moments of debate established logos for the audience.
Good
Several specific sources were utilized for the greater overall effect of the argument by establishing logos for the audience.
Excellent
The logos used in the argument left no doubt in the audience's view that the team had the research necessary to fully support their argument and easily triumph, making the presence of ethos and pathos almost unnecessary.
Counter Argument
Poor
The opposing team's argument was not addressed.
Fair
The team mentioned the opposing team's argument 1-2 times during debate.
Good
The team continuously mentioned the other team's arguments, to the advantage of their own team.
Excellent
The team continuously mentioned the other team's arguments, to the advantage of their own team and effectively dismantled the opposing team's arguments by predicting it and weakening it.
Execution
Poor
The team did not appear prepared and no evidence of practice was displayed during the debate.
Fair
The team seemed somewhat prepared and at least one speaker was clearly prepared.
Good
The team had clearly prepared as they had well researched points, clear goals, and seemed well-rehearsed in its delivery.
Excellent
The team's speakers were well-rehearsed, eloquent, and supported by thorough research. There was no rushing or unnecessary pausing in their presentation of arguments.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.