iRubric: Agecny Presentation Rubric Worksheet

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Agecny Presentation Rubric Worksheet

ACOL206-Industry Practice(1)

Rubric Code: LX9A736

By sal_eh

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Agecny Presentation Final Project
	Excellent 4 (N/A)	Good 3 (N/A)	Fair 2 (N/A)	Poor 1 (N/A)
CONTENT OF THE PRESENTATION
Introduction 4 pts	Excellent The introduction is inviting, states the main topic and previews the structure of the presentation.	Good The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the structure of the presentation, but is not particularly inviting to the listener.	Fair Introduction sounded a bit choppy and confusing.	Poor There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the presentation.
Subject Knowledge 5 pts	Excellent Student demonstrates full knowledge by answering all questions with explanations and elaboration.	Good Student is at ease with expected answers to all questions, without elaboration.	Fair Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.	Poor Student does not have grasp of information; student cannot answer questions about subject.
Organization 5 pts	Excellent Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow. Well-constructed slides reflecting logical sequence.	Good Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. Well-constructed slides.	Fair Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around. Slides are not well-constructed.	Poor Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.
Audio / Visual Content 5 pts	Excellent Audio-Visual resources are incorporated, related to the topic and used effectively as supportive material	Good Audio-Visual resources are incorporated, related to the topic but are not used effectively as supportive material	Fair Audio-Visual resources are incorporated but not fully related to the topic	Poor Audio-Visual resources are incorporated, but are not at all related to the topic
Conclusion 4 pts	Excellent The presentation was summed up clearly and effectively, with key points emphasized.	Good The presentation was summed up clearly.	Fair The presentation conclusion was confusing.	Poor An attempt was made to conclude the presentation.
Mechanics 2 pts	Excellent Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.	Good Presentation has no more than two misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Fair Presentation has three misspellings and/or grammatical errors.	Poor Student’s presentation has four or more spelling and/or grammatical errors.
SPEAKING SKILLS
Delivery 3 pts	Excellent The student speaks very clearly without hesitation. Pronunciation and intonation sound natural.	Good The student speaks with some hesitation. Problems with pronunciation and intonation do not prevent communication.	Fair The student hesitates frequently. Problems with pronunciation and intonation distort meaning and inhibit communication in some instances.	Poor Frequent hesitations and extreme problems with pronunciation cause communication to break down.
Eye Contact 1 pts	Excellent Presenter keeps head up, look relaxed and confident; establishes eye contact with audience during presentation.	Good Presenter stand up straight and establishes eye contact with audience during presentation.	Fair Presenter sometimes stand up straight and establishes eye contact with audience during presentation.	Poor Slouches and or doesn't look at the audience during presentation.
Volume 1 pts	Excellent Presenter can be easily heard by all. No gum, etc.	Good Presenter speaks loudly and clearly most of the time.	Fair Presenter speaks slowly an and not so clear.	Poor Presenter Speaks too quietly and not clearly.
GROUP WORK
Teamwork 5 pts	Excellent The team worked well together to achieve objectives. Each member contributed in a valuable way to the project. All data sources indicated a high level of mutual respect and collaboration	Good The team worked well together most of the time, with only a few occurrences of communication breakdown or failure to collaborate when appropriate. Members were mostly respectful of each other.	Fair Team did not collaborate or communicate well. Some members would work independently, without regard to objectives or priorities. A lack of respect and regard was frequently noted	Poor Some members in the team did't contribute in the work.
Contribution 5 pts	Excellent The teammates always worked from others’ ideas. It was evident that all of the group members contributed equally to the presentation	Good The teammatesworked from others’ ideas most of the time. And it seems like every did some work, but some people are carrying the presentation.	Fair The teammates sometimes worked from others’ ideas. However it seems as though certain people did not do as much work as others..	Poor The teammates never worked from others’ ideas. It seems as though only a few people worked on the presentation.
QUALITY OF WORK
Total Points 40 pts Total Points 40 pts Total Points - Exceptional (points: 30-40) - Above expectations (points: 20-29) - Satisfactory (points: 10-19) - Below expectations (points: 6-9) - Unsatisfactory (points:0-9)	Excellent Points: 30-40 performance well exceed expectations. (exceptionally done)	Good Points: 20-29 performance is above specified expectations. (well done)	Fair Points: 10-19 Performance is less than specified expectations. (fairly done)	Poor Points: 0-9 Performance is lower than specified expectations. (poorly done)

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric