- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: The Twits rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
The Twits The students produces three types of writing: response to questions, a news report, a prank, a poem, a letter or an alternate chapter or ending to the novel the Twits. The important aspects are descriptive language and point of view. Rubric Code: LX8256A By jmcclinton Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: 6-8

Enter rubric title
	Level 1 (N/A)	Level 2 (N/A)	Level 3 (N/A)	Level 4 (N/A)
Developing and Organizing Content	Level 1 The student had difficulty generating and organizing appropriate ideas for responses to questions, a poem, a prank, a letter, a news report and/or an alternate chapter for The Twits.	Level 2 The student generates and organizes some appropriate ideas for responses to questions, a poem, a prank, a letter, a news report and/or an alternate chapter for The Twits.	Level 3 The student generates and organizes appropriate ideas for responses to questions, a poem, a prank, a letter, a news report and/or an alternate chapter for The Twits.	Level 4 The student generates and organizes Roald Dahl-like ideas for responses to questions, a poem, a prank, a letter, a news report and/or an alternate chapter for The Twits.
Using Knowledge of Form and Style	Level 1 The student does little to imitate the style of Roald Dahl in their writing. The student uses little vivid and/or figurative language. simile metaphor	Level 2 The student tries to imitate the style of Roald Dahl in their writing. The student tries to use some vivid and/or figurative language. simile metaphor	Level 3 The student generally imitates the style of Roald Dahl in their writing. The student uses some vivid and/or figurative language. simile metaphor	Level 4 The student skillfully imitates the style of Roald Dahl in their writing. The student makes excellent use of vivid and/or figurative language. simile metaphor
Applying Knowledge of Language Conv	Level 1 The student did not appear to proofread and correct their writing using guidelines developed with peers and the teacher.	Level 2 The student did little to proofread and correct their writing using guidelines developed with peers and the teacher.	Level 3 The student did proofread and correct their writing using guidelines developed with peers and the teacher.	Level 4 The student did a very thorough job proofreading and correcting their writing using guidelines developed with peers and the teacher.