iRubric: Wiki Entries rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Wiki Entries

A rubric for the numerous entries to the course Wiki centering on technology in education.

Rubric Code: L588XA

By OSU791

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Graduate

Wiki Entries
	Superior 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 0 pts
Accuracy	Superior Information provided in the entry represents both accurate information and the most updated data regarding the topic. Material is well documented, utilizing reputable academic sources.	Good Information within the entry is accurate and represents the general information concerning the issue. Various resources are synthesized – some being academic and others sourcing from other domains.	Fair Entry represents the general information available about the key concept. Some of the narrative is subjective and open to various interpretations. Resource utilization is minimal or not academic in nature.	Poor Entry is either missing or contains factual inaccuracies. Key components may be missing and there is no indication of external sources being utilized.
Entry Revision & Enhancement	Superior The submission is revised throughout the course to incorporate new information and new perspectives concerning the topic of interest. These changes make substantial contributions to the understanding of the assigned topic.	Good Entry is updated and changed throughout the course to incorporate selected feedback. Revisions represent progressive inclusion of key information leading to deeper understanding of the issue.	Fair Submission is submitted and only slightly changed throughout the course. Little or no effort made to provide content enhancement or connect entry to larger concepts.	Poor Entry is either missing or is not modified throughout the course. No effort is made to enhance entry throughout the course.
Inclusion of Academic Language	Superior The entry makes connections and references to key theories and proven academic theologians in a purposeful and viable manner. The entry uses correct context and syntheses in regards to this component.	Good The student includes key concepts and individuals that helped formulate this concept or construct. There is some ambiguity regarding the application of this synthesis and/or some analysis may be in error.	Fair There is minimal attempt to include key theories or the developed concepts within the entry. Inclusion of some material may be vague or not applicable to the concept being discussed.	Poor There is no connection to established theory of the leaders in the field being examined. Little or no evidence found regarding the utilization of key academic language.
Expectations	Superior Student exceeds general rubric guidelines and surpasses instructor expectations. Student provides new avenues of thought and pedagogy through the microlesson process.	Good Student meets general rubric guidelines and attempts to surpass instructor expectations. Effective use of existing and/or provided materials.	Fair Student meets minimum rubric guidelines in most categories. Student limits efforts to assignment description and guidelines.	Poor Student did not meet expectations in any portion of the assignment. Student performance was well below instructor expectations.

Keywords:

education, technology, wiki

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Discuss this rubric