Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Boys Varsity Football Head and Health/PE Coach Rubric

iRubric: Boys Varsity Football Head and Health/PE Coach Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Boys Varsity Football Head and Health/PE Coach Rubric Boys Varsity Football Head and Health/PE Coach Rubric Interview rubric for Boys Football Head Coach and Health/PE Teacher Rubric Code: L2X4W49 By dmatherne Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Physical Ed., Fitness Type: Assessment Grade Levels: (none)

FB Coaching Interview Rubric
	Poor demonstrates little evidence 1 pts	Fair demonstrates average evidence 2 pts	Good demonstrates a higher than average amount of evidence 3 pts	Excellent demonstrates a superior answer or outstanding amount of evidence. 4 pts	Questions (N/A)
Appearance	Poor Candidate exhibits very little idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Fair Candidate exhibits some idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Good Candidate indicates ways to properly deescalte situation and deal with the conflict.	Excellent Candidate shows a vast array of techniques to handle the situation and to de escalate the situation and handle the conflict.	Questions How would you handle the following? You have a senior athlete who is dedicated to the program and is passed over in off season workouts by an underclassmen, his parents come in to confront you, describe how you handle the conversation.
Coaching Experience	Poor Candidate exhibits very little idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Fair Candidate exhibits some idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Good Candidate indicates ways to properly deescalte situation and deal with the conflict.	Excellent Candidate shows a vast array of techniques to handle the situation and to de escalate the situation and handle the conflict.	Questions Some items are sometimes a part of the culture of football and become acceptable. Describe how you would handle some of these issues around your program such as foul language, chewing tobacco, and even hazing in some cases.
Content Knowledge	Poor Candidate does not see any items in personal life needing adjustment.	Fair Candidate recognizes personal life may have some adjustment, but cites little examples.	Good Candidate recognizes the fact that changes will possibly need made and cites examples of how it will impact them personally.	Excellent Candidate has a thorough idea of how the position will affect them personally and what they will have to do to properly adjust to the focal position they will hold. Candidate is able to give examples along with how they will handle.	Questions Do you think if you are selected the head coach that you will have to make adjustments in your personal life? Explain why you feel as you do and how you plan to balance your personal life with the time consuming role of head football coach?
Leadership	Poor Candidate demonstrated no accomodations to be made for their employment elsewhere.	Fair Candidate has some ideas of how they will deal with their employment elsewhere.	Good Candidate has solid ideas of how they will overcome their employment elsewhere and cites examples of how to deal with this obstacle.	Excellent Candidate has detailed<BR> ideas of how they will overcome their employment elsewhere and cites examples of how to deal with this obstacle.	Questions Describe how you will handle the fact that you do not teach at Beaver Local and the effect that will have on your program. Describe some of the ways that you plan to work around this roadblock.
Work History	Poor Candidate does not cite examples of how to maximize exposure for his team through the media.	Fair Candidate cites some ideas of how to get exposure for their team through the media.	Good Candidate cites a variety of manners, ideas they have which would generate interest in the players and maximize their exposure.	Excellent Candidate understands the importance of makign sure kids feel valued, and cites examples of how this will occur and the need to use the media to bolster as many individuals as possible.	Questions Every newspaper has pre-season press releases for fall sports and most specifically football. What do you feel is most important thing that you can do in those releases and how would you use those to benefit your team?
Career Plans	Poor Candidate does not cite examples of how to handle to communicate effectively after a an undesired outcome.	Fair candidate understand the importance of how to deal with this situation after a tough game and cites examples of how to do so.	Good Candidate cites a variety of ideas of how to deal with the media and his players after a tough loss which fosters team unity and growth.	Excellent Candidate is able to reflect on what would be needed to help team grown and learn from the tough loss as well as recognizing the importance of handling the media in a way that doesn't reflect poorly on him or his team.	Questions After a tough game that resulted in a tough loss, as a result of staff error or player error, describe how you would handle the media, handle the dejected team in the locker room?
Football Experience	Poor Candidate does not provide examples with evidence of how they will be accoplished to get the community involved.	Fair Candidate has conventional ideas such as youth camps, and boosters but not ideas which are creative in nature.	Good Candidate has examples of ideas which are creative to foster community involvement but shows little evidence of how they will be accomplished.	Excellent Candidate has creative ideas of ways to involve the community with evidence to show how they will be accomplished.	Questions As discussed, please share with us, some of the ideas that you came up with which will motivate the community, and generate excitement in what you are trying to build and start with the 2012 season of Beaver Local Football.
Structure/Discipline	Poor candidate doesn't have a clear idea of how to deal with this issue.	Fair Candidate has an idea of what is expected but does not have clear expectations of how to accomplish	Good Candidate has expectation and and clear expectations with methods to accomplish these goals and expectations.	Excellent candidate has a through understanding of what is needed to build structure and discipline. Candidate has examples of how this will be implemented and accomplished in their program.	Questions What do you view as the most important elements to build structure and discipline in your program? What will you do when a highly respected player on the team doesn't meet those expectations?
Program Vision	Poor Candidate demonstrated no long-term plans or goals for program. Candidate does have goals but not clear evidence of how they will move to accomplish.	Fair Candidate has some ideas of future for program, but did not specifically express what the goals are with ways to implement	Good Candidate has direction of goals for program and a plan to achieve desired goals	Excellent Candidate has detailed plans for goals and vision of program and provides explanation with evidence how they will be accomplished.	Questions Describe three short term goals for the program if you were selected the head coach. Looking ahead, describe three long term goals for the program.
Coaching Expectations	Poor Candidate has some knowledge of roles among the staff.	Fair candidate has detailed knowledge about what is expected from the staff and also from them as the leader of the staff	Good candidate has clear expectations with well defined roles for each of the coaches	Excellent candidate has outlined roles with expectations and gives examples fo what each coach is expected to do to be successful on the staff	Questions Who do you plan to have on your staff, and what roles will they have? How will they be organized across the various levels of the program?
Personal Qualities	Poor candidate is not reflective in nature and is only able to cite strengths they can offer the program	Fair Candidate is reflective in nature but isn't able to tell how these items will impact the program	Good Candidate is able to cite strengths and weaknesses and how they will impact the program but doesn not tell how they will work to address their weaknesses	Excellent Candidate is reflective and is able to cite examples of positive and negative items which they will use to foster and grow the program. They also address how they will handle their weaknesses.	Questions Tell us your strengths and weaknesses that you will bring to the program.
Eligibility	Poor Candidate has little experience and does not have knowledge of ways to help athletes stay eligible	Fair candidate cites examples that are proactive and methods which will help students stay eligible.	Good candidate shows that they would place their eligibility and role of a student ahead of their role as a football player	Excellent Candidate cites examples of how they will work in a hands on manner to make sure that the student achieves their academic potential while a member of their program.	Questions What steps will you take to make sure students athletes are eligible?
Conflict management	Poor Candidate exhibits very little idea how to properly deal with the situation	Fair Candidate exhibits some idea how to properly deal with the situation.	Good Candidate indicates ways to properly deescalte situation and deal with the conflict.	Excellent Candidate shows a vast array of techniques to handle the situation and to de escalate the situation and handle the conflict.	Questions Party. Happens during the season you find out, what do you do? Will you handle the same regardless of whether a starting senior or freshman?

Keywords:

Football Coach Interview

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Physical Ed., Fitness rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16