iRubric: Drama Film Review rubric

The introduction of the review includes ALL of the following:
- film’s name, year, and director
- begins to evaluate the film, including a central concept of the review.

The introduction of the review includes MOST of the following, but struggles at times to provide a central concept for the review.
- film’s name, year, and director
- begins to evaluate the film, including a central concept of the review.

The introduction of the review includes the film's name, year, and director, but does not provide a central concept for the review.

The introduction of the review is limited and does not include a central concept or all basic details of the film (name, year, director).

The review includes BOTH of the following, IN DETAIL:
- a more detailed description of the writer's experience watching the film. Including his/her personal impression of what the film looks,
feels, and sounds like.
AND
- an analysis of how well the film utilizes formal techniques (cinematography, editing, mise-en-scène, lighting, sound,
genre, or narrative) and thematic content (history, race, gender, sexuality, class, or the
environment).

The review includes BOTH of the following, but could be more detailed:
- a more detailed description of the writer's experience watching the film. Including his/her personal impression of what the film looks,
feels, and sounds like.
AND
- an analysis of how well the film utilizes formal techniques (cinematography, editing, mise-en-scène, lighting, sound,
genre, or narrative) and thematic content (history, race, gender, sexuality, class, or the
environment).

The review includes only ONE of the following:
- a more detailed description of the writer's experience watching the film. Including his/her personal impression of what the film looks,
feels, and sounds like.
AND
- an analysis of how well the film utilizes formal techniques (cinematography, editing, mise-en-scène, lighting, sound,
genre, or narrative) and thematic content (history, race, gender, sexuality, class, or the
environment).

The review struggles to include either of the following with clarity:
- a more detailed description of the writer's experience watching the film. Including his/her personal impression of what the film looks,
feels, and sounds like.
AND
- an analysis of how well the film utilizes formal techniques (cinematography, editing, mise-en-scène, lighting, sound,
genre, or narrative) and thematic content (history, race, gender, sexuality, class, or the
environment).

Demonstrates a command of standard English conventions and cohesion, with few errors. Response includes language and tone appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt.

Demonstrates a command of standard English conventions and cohesion, with few errors. Response struggles to include language and tone appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt.

Demonstrates an uneven command of standard English conventions and cohesion. Accuracy and/or appropriateness of language and tone is uneven.

Attempts to demonstrate standard English conventions, but lacks cohesion and control of grammar, usage, and mechanics.