iRubric: Project Implementations rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Project Implementations

I am a student teacher and I am responsible for teaching five classes in a reading program for 34 tenth-grade students; this is a short program designed to boost the students' confidence ahead of the national English exam.

Rubric Code: L25342W

By pipegutierrez

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Attendance

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Implementation Reading plan
	It definitely worked 4 pts	It worked partially 3 pts	Somewhat Lacking 2 pts	Significantly Lacking 1 pts
Tenth grade Student attendance and satisfaction.	It definitely worked Students attend 90–100% of sessions consistently. Students arrive on time for nearly every session. Students actively participate and show strong interest in activities. Students report very positive experiences and increased confidence.	It worked partially Students attend 75–89% of sessions. Students are occasionally late but usually prepared. Students usually participate and show interest. Students report mostly positive experiences.	Somewhat Lacking Students attend 50–74% of sessions. Students are frequently late. Students participate only when prompted. Students report mixed feelings about the program.	Significantly Lacking Students attend less than 50% of sessions. Students regularly miss the beginning of sessions. Students rarely participate or appear disengaged. Students report dissatisfaction or no improvement in confidence.
Students performance in the activity.	It definitely worked Demonstrates full understanding of the text and answers accurately. Effectively uses strategies such as skimming, scanning, and predicting independently. Participates actively and contributes confidently throughout the activity. Completes all parts of the activity correctly and on time.	It worked partially Shows good understanding with minor errors. Uses some strategies with little support. Participates regularly with some confidence. Completes most of the activity with few mistakes.	Somewhat Lacking Shows partial understanding with several errors. Uses strategies only with teacher support. Participates occasionally when prompted. Completes part of the activity with several mistakes.	Significantly Lacking Shows limited understanding of the text. Rarely uses reading strategies. Rarely participates in the activity. Does not complete the activity.
Grading of the materials used in class.	It definitely worked Materials fully support the lesson objective and exam preparation. Materials strongly motivate and engage students. Materials match students’ English level perfectly. Materials are clear, attractive, and well organized.	It worked partially Materials mostly support the objective. Materials generally engage students. Materials mostly match students’ level. Materials are clear with minor issues.	Somewhat Lacking Materials partially support the objective. Materials engage some students only. Materials are somewhat too easy or difficult. Materials show some organization problems.	Significantly Lacking Materials do not clearly support the objective. Materials fail to engage students. Materials are inappropriate for students’ level. Materials are unclear or poorly organized.
Feedback provided by the cooperating professor	It definitely worked Plans are clear, organized, and aligned with lesson objectives. Maintains a positive, well-controlled learning environment. Explains content clearly and uses effective teaching strategies. Consistently reflects and applies suggestions for improvement.	It worked partially Plans are organized with minor adjustments needed. Manages the class with occasional difficulties. Instruction is clear with some effective strategies. Usually applies feedback appropriately.	Somewhat Lacking Plans show partial organization or weak alignment. Shows some difficulty managing students. Instruction is somewhat unclear or limited. Sometimes applies feedback.	Significantly Lacking Plans lack organization or clear objectives. Classroom management is ineffective. Instruction is unclear and ineffective. Rarely applies feedback or reflects.
Self-assessment of the activity	It definitely worked Clearly identifies strengths and explains their impact on learning. Honestly identifies areas for improvement with clear examples. Thoroughly analyzes how students responded to the activity. Proposes realistic and specific steps for future improvement.	It worked partially Identifies strengths with some explanation Identifies some areas for improvement Describes student response adequately. Suggests some steps for improvement.	Somewhat Lacking Mentions strengths with limited detail. Recognizes few weaknesses. Gives limited analysis of student response. Suggests vague improvements.	Significantly Lacking Shows little reflection on strengths. Does not identify weaknesses. Provides little or no analysis of student response. Does not propose improvements.

Keywords:

performance, attendance

Subjects:

English

Types:

Discuss this rubric