Skip to main content

iRubric: Rhetorical Analysis Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rhetorical Analysis Rubric 
Rhetorical Analysis
Rubric Code: L237A82
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Rhetorical Analysis Essay Rubric
  Little Success (1-2)

(N/A)

Inadequate (3-4)

(N/A)

Inconsistent/Limited (5)

(N/A)

Adequate (6-7)

(N/A)

Effective (8-9)

(N/A)

Addresses all the tasks--25 points
0 pts

Little Success (1-2)

These essays demonstrate minimal understanding of the ad.
Inadequate (3-4)

These essays are weaker than the 5 score because the writer overlooks or perhaps misreads important ideas in the ad.
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Essays that earn a medium score complete the essay task, but with no special insights; the analysis lacks depth and merely states the obvious. Frequently, the ideas are predictable and the paragraph development weak. Although the writing conveys the writer's ideas, they are presented simplistically and often contain lapses in diction or syntax.
Adequate (6-7)

Medium-scoring essays complete the tasks of the essay topic well - they show some insight but usually with less precision and clarity than high-scoring essays.
Effective (8-9)

High-scoring essays thoroughly address all the tasks of the essay prompt in well-organized responses. Overall, high-scoring essays present thoroughly developed, intelligent ideas; sound and logical organization; strong evidence; and articulate diction.
Style
10 pts

Little Success (1-2)

Perhaps unfinished, these essays offer no analysis of the passage and little or no evidence for the student's ideas. Incorrect assertions may be made about the ad.
Inadequate (3-4)

The student may summarize the passage's ideas instead of analyzing them.
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Although the writing conveys the writer's ideas, they are presented simplistically and often contain lapses in diction or syntax.
Adequate (6-7)

There may be lapses in correct diction or sophisticated language, but the essay is generally well written.
Effective (8-9)

The writing demonstrates stylistic sophistication and control over the elements of effective writing, although it is not necessarily faultless.
Conventions
10 pts

Little Success (1-2)

Stylistically, these essays may show consistent grammatical problems, and sentence structure is usually simple and unimaginative.
Inadequate (3-4)

Although the writer's ideas are generally understandable, the control of language is often immature.
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Although the writing conveys the writer's ideas, they are presented simplistically and often contain lapses in diction or syntax.
Adequate (6-7)

Presents thoroughly developed, intelligent ideas; sound and logical organization; strong evidence; and articulate diction.
Effective (8-9)

Overall, high-scoring essays present thoroughly developed, intelligent ideas; sound and logical organization; strong evidence; and articulate diction.
Rhetorical Analysis
60 pts

Little Success (1-2)

Rhetorical analysis essays demonstrate little ability to identify or analyze rhetorical strategies.
Inadequate (3-4)

Rhetorical analysis essays demonstrate little discussion of rhetorical strategies or incorrect identification and/or analysis of those strategies.
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Rhetorical analysis essays demonstrate uneven or insufficient understanding of how rhetorical strategies create an author's point. Often, the writer merely lists what he or she observes in the ad instead of analyzing effect.
Adequate (6-7)

Rhetorical analysis essays demonstrate sufficient examination of the ad's point and the rhetorical strategies he uses to enhance the central idea.
Effective (8-9)

Rhetorical analysis essays demonstrate significant understanding of the ad, its intent, and the rhetorical strategies the ad employs.
Introduction
10 pts

Little Success (1-2)

Attention getter present; <BR>
thesis statement present
Inadequate (3-4)

Attention getter present; <BR>
thesis statement foreshadows organization of essay
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Attention getter present, offers background that ties in to attention getter; <BR>
thesis statement foreshadows organization of essay
Adequate (6-7)

Attention getter interesting, offers background that ties in to attention getter; <BR>
thesis statement foreshadows organization of essay
Effective (8-9)

Strong, effective attention getter; offers effective background that explains attention getter; thesis statement is sophisticated; foreshadows organization of essay
Conclusion
10 pts

Little Success (1-2)

Restates thesis; contains other summary material but does not bring argument to logical conclusion
Inadequate (3-4)

Restates thesis and elements of essay; clincher is evident
Inconsistent/Limited (5)

Restates thesis and elements of essay that prove point; clincher is evident and ties in with attention getter
Adequate (6-7)

Restates thesis and elements of essay that prove point; clincher is powerful and ties in with attention getter
Effective (8-9)

Restates thesis and elements of essay that prove point; effectively closes the sale:brings points to logical conlusion; clincher is powerful and ties in with attention getter



Keywords:
  • Rhetorical Analysis

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224