- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Learning Outcome No. 1 rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Learning Outcome No. 1 Case Study Oral Presentation Learner will be able to demonstrate their knowledge and understanding of the Public Procurement Cycle and the different phases Rubric Code: KXC7XX3 By sharuhen Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Public Administration Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Graduate

Knowledge presentation
	Poor 10 pts	Good 30 pts	Fair 30 pts	Excellent 30 pts
Presentation	Poor The presentation was inarticulate and difficult to follow. Poor delivery and timing of information. Did not seem to know the material. Poor discussion and/or understanding.	Good The presentation was mostly smooth and seamless, few verbal pauses. The Learner appeared calm, had a general grasp of information. Proficient delivery and timing of information. Proficient discussion initiated/ maintained	Fair The presentation was choppy, difficult to follow. Learner did not have a grasp on the information. Frequent pauses for him or her to find their place. Too many unnecessary words. Needs more interaction and discussion of questions.	Excellent The presentation was smooth and seamless. The learner appeared to understand and in communicate the information clearly. Exceptional delivery. Exceptional discussion intiated and maintained to facilitate learning
Content	Poor The PowerPoint slides were completely unrelated to the topic being discussed and/or were unintelligible. Weak conclusions. Presentation needs to be more logical and organized.	Good The PowerPoint slides were somewhat organized. Student somewhat understands the dynamics, presented some realistic alternatives, objectives, some sound implementation strategies.	Fair The PowerPoint slides were difficult to understand and difficult to read. Student does not understand the case information. Unrealistic solutions.	Excellent The PowerPoint slides were clear and understandable. Student understands the dynamics, presented realistic alternatives, objectives, sound implementation strategies.
Completeness	Poor Lack of critical or analytical thought and little to no insight utilized.	Good Proficient critical analysis of issue and impact using many details and evidence. Moderate insight into issue.	Fair More details, insight, and critical thought needed.	Excellent Exceptional insight into critical components & analysis of issue.