Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Synthesis Essay rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Synthesis Essay
Literary/Style Analysis Essay
Rubric Code:
KXB922C
By
CaryHall
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Synthesis
Poor
(D-F)
1 pts
Fair
(C)
2 pts
Good
(B)
3 pts
Excellent
(A)
4 pts
Introduction
Poor
Missing a thesis, book title, OR an explanation of the three sources.
Fair
Introduction has a hook is weak, silly, or distracting, an explanation of the three sources that lacks relationship between them, and a vague thesis.
Good
Introduction has a somewhat interesting hook, an explanation of the three sources that shows some relationship between them, and a clear thesis that takes a position.
Excellent
Introduction has an interesting, creative hook, an explanation of the three sources that establishes a clear relationship between them, and a clear thesis that tells the reader what will appear in the body paragraphs and takes a position.
Synthesis
Poor
The essay does not convince the reader that your hypothesis is an educated and informed opinion, does not show the relationship between the three sources, and is not backed by evidence in the form of examples from all three: LOTF, MSFM, and scholarly/popular sources on the SPE.
Fair
The essay somewhat the reader that your hypothesis is an educated and informed opinion, that shows some relationship between all three sources and is backed by evidence in the form of examples from all three: LOTF, MSFM, and scholarly/popular sources on the SPE.
Good
The essay mostly convinces the reader that your hypothesis is an educated and informed opinion, that shows relationship between all three sources and is backed by relevant evidence that relates all three sources in the form of examples from all three: LOTF, MSFM, and scholarly sources on the SPE.
Excellent
The essay convinces the reader that your hypothesis is an educated and informed opinion, that establishes a strong relationship between all three sources and is backed by strong, relevant evidence in the form of examples from all three: LOTF, MSFM, and scholarly sources on the SPE.
Body
Poor
Essay contains minimal attempt at analysis. The analysis relies too much on summary, is off topic, or doesn't make sense.
Fair
Essay contains some analysis that is shallow or illogical. May rely too much on summary. Body paragraphs contain 2 of the following: a topic sentence, introduced quote, analysis, and link to next paragraph.
Good
Essay contains analysis that is somewhat shallow but shows a true attempt to understand the texts. Body paragraphs contain 3 of the following: a topic sentence, introduced quote, analysis, and link to next paragraph.
Excellent
Essay contains analysis that shows creativity, is deep but logical, and demonstrates true attempt to understand the texts. Body paragraphs contain a topic sentence, introduced quote, analysis, and link to next paragraph.
Conclusion
Poor
There is minimal attempt to conclude: does not restate thesis and main points. Does not answer the question, "So what?" Or, there is no clear conclusion; the paper just ends.
Fair
Conclusion feels incomplete. Does restate thesis but does not restate main points. Does not answer the question, "So what?"
Good
Conclusion restates thesis and main points, and leaves the reader with something to think about. It adequately answers the question, "So what?"
Excellent
Conclusion restates the thesis, reviews the main points, and leaves the reader thinking. It provides a thought-provoking answer to the question, "So what?"
Coherence and Cohesion
Coherent = Logical
Cohesive = Unified
Poor
Details are not well-connected, lack order.
Writing is confusing and hard to follow. Contains fragments and/or run-on sentences. Transitions and quote introductions are missing.
Fair
Several ideas are not well-connected. Writing is not very smooth, and may not always make sense. Some transitions and quote introductions are missing. Some sentences are strong, but some areas lack strength and variety.
Good
Most ideas are well-connected. Details are organized logically, chronologically (time order), or sequentially (first, second, etc.).
Writing is mostly smooth and makes sense. Transitions and quote introductions are used appropriately.
Excellent
Ideas are well-connected. Details are organized logically, either chronologically or sequentially.
Writing is smooth and makes sense. Sentences are strong and express ideas with varied structure and connectors. Transitional words and conjunctions are used masterfully.
Style
Poor
Shows no awareness of audience, overly simplistic word choice, little variety of sentence structure,
and little to no use of transitions and quote introductions.
Fair
Shows basic awareness of audience, simplistic word choice, some variety of sentence structure,
and limited use of transitions and quote introductions.
Good
Shows basic awareness of audience, some control of voice, some variety in sentence structure
and word choice, and some smooth transitions and quote introductions.
Excellent
Shows strong
awareness of audience,
control of voice,
variety in sentence
structure, precise
word choice, and
smooth transitions and quote introductions.
Mechanics
Poor
The essay is difficult to read because of errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization or punctuation. Contains contractions and or slang.
Fair
The essay is readable, but contains many errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization or punctuation. Contains 1-3 uses of contractions and or slang.
Good
The essay contains several errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization or punctuation. Contains NO contractions and or slang.
Excellent
The essay contains very few errors in grammar, spelling, capitalization or punctuation. Contains NO contractions and or slang.
Evidence and Citation
Poor
-No textual evidence provided in the form of quotes or examples.
-No Works Cited and/OR no in-text citations.
Fair
-Contains only one or two pieces of textual evidence, or quotes do not support thesis.
-Quotes are not introduced.
-Incorrectly formatted Works Cited page and/or issues with in-text citations.
Good
-Each body paragraph contains a quoted or paraphrased passage that clearly supports the sub-topics and thesis.
-Quotes are introduced.
-Works Cited exists. Some small in-text citation errors.
Excellent
-Each body paragraph contains a quoted or paraphrased passage that clearly supports the sub-topics and thesis.
-Quotes are skillfully introduced.
-Works Cited exists and citations are done properly.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.