- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Group Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Group Presentation Rubric Group Presentation Rubric This rubric is designed to assess the of the group Instagram project. The rubric should consider the performance of the group as a whole, as well as individual contributions. Rubric Code: KXAB676 By PBC249 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Dance Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Group Project Rubric 100 %
	Excellent 25 pts	Meets Expectations 23 pts	Approaches Expectations 20 pts	Needs Improvement 14 pts
Instagram Site 25 %	Excellent Instagram site was very organized and was very easy to follow. Transitions between group members were well planned and executed cleanly.	Meets Expectations Instagram site was fairly organized and pretty followable. Transitions might have been slightly discontinuous but did not take away greatly from the overall presentation.	Approaches Expectations Instagram site was not clearly organized. Transitions between members were jumpy or awkward.	Needs Improvement Instagram site lacked organization. Poor transitions between group members individual parts. Presentation lacked order and very difficult to follow.
Teamwork/Participation 25 %	Excellent The group worked very well with each other and the contributions were equal among the group members.	Meets Expectations The group worked well with each other and communicated well. Some members contributed slightly more than others.	Approaches Expectations Group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the contributions and others did not contribute much.	Needs Improvement Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses contributions.
Content 25 %	Excellent Group members had a stronghold on the content and content was thoroughly addressed. No mistakes were made with regard to content knowledge.	Meets Expectations Most of the group members has a solid understanding of the content. Content missing minor elements or contained minor errors.	Approaches Expectations Group members had only a superficial understanding of content. Several mistakes were made during the presentation.	Needs Improvement Group members had little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation.
Images 25 %	Excellent Images used were used effectively throughout presentation. Group members used Images as a supplement, not as a crutch.	Meets Expectations Images used were somewhat effective, but weren't used consistently though out the site.	Approaches Expectations Images used did not support site information.	Needs Improvement Images were not used at all.