Skip to main content
iRubric: Evaluation of Multimedia/App or Website rubric

iRubric: Evaluation of Multimedia/App or Website rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Evaluation of Multimedia/App or Website 
This is a rubric I developed to assess multimedia/app or website for my Masters class MALL 551: Analysis and Evaluation of Multimedia in Education class.
Rubric Code: KX35947
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Multimedia/app/website Evaluation
Evaluation and assessment of multimedia/apps or websites
  Poor

Everything is poor, difficult, doesn't work and very slow.

1 pts

Fair

Everything is Hard, slow or never works.

2 pts

Good

Everything is good, but is lacking finesse

3 pts

Very Good

Everything is almost perfect.

4 pts

Excellent

Everything is Perfect

5 pts

Design/Technological Elements

*Color scheme
*Navigation
*hyperlinks
*load times

Poor

*Color scheme is poor.
*Navigation is difficult.
*Hyperlinks don't work.
*Loading time is very slow.
Fair

*Color Scheme is Fair.
*Navigation is hard.
*Hyperlinks almost never work.
*Loading time is slow.
Good

*Color Scheme is Good.
*Navigation is fairly hard.
* Hyperlinks work some of the time.
*Loading time is slow-moderate.
Very Good

*Color Scheme is very good.
*Navigation is Moderately easy.
*Hyperlings work most all the time.
*Loading time is Moderate-fast.
Excellent

*Color Scheme is Excellent.
*Navigation is easy and self explanitory.
*Hyperlinks work all the time.
Loading time is fast and easy.
Focus

Intent and purpose Clear?
*Accomplishes Purpose
*Language learning goals clear
*Pedagogy of design and activities clear.
*Levels of interactivity avalaible for students.

Poor

* Intent and Purpose is unclear.
*Does not accomplish purpose.
*Language learning goals unclear.
*Pedagogy of design and activities unclear.
*Levels of interactivity unavailable to students.
Fair

*Intent and purpose is vague.
*Vague accomplishement of purpose.
*Language learning goals vague.
*Pedagogy of design and activities vague.
*levels of interactivite semi-available to students.
Good

*Intent and purpose is good.
*Accomplishment of purpose is adequate.
*Language learning goals adequate.
*Pedagogy of design and activities adequate.
Very Good

*Intent and purpose is very good.
*Accomplishment of purpose is very good.
*Language learning goals are very good.
*Pedagogy of design and activities are very good.
Excellent

*Intent and purpose is excellent.
*Accomplishment of purpose is excellent.
*Language learning goals are excellent.
*Pedagogy of design and activities are excellent.
Activities

*What are the activities provided?
*Learning Theories?

Poor

* Activities do not fit description.
*Learning Theories Aren't understood.
Fair

*Activities are poorly developed.
*Learning theories aren't clear.
Good

*Activities need work.
*Learning theories are lacking some clarity.
Very Good

*Activities are very good.
*Learning theories are well understood.
Excellent

*Activities are Excellent
*Learning Theories very clear.
Fundamental Elements

*Are Basicd operations intuitive?
*Difficultie and ease of activities.
*Students and Teachers have to read instructions or is it easily understood how to use.

Poor

* Basic operations are not intutitive.
*Activities are difficult.
*Students and teachers have difficulty understanding instructions on use.
Fair

* Basic operations are poorly understood.
*Activities are fair-difficult.
*Students and teachers find it fairly hard to understandinstructions on use.
Good

* Basic operations are fairly intuitive, but need work.
*Activities are moderate
*Students and teachers have some difficulty understanding instructions on use.
Very Good

* Basic operations are fairly intuitive.
*Activities are moderate-easy.
*Students and teachers have no difficulty understanding instructions on use.
Excellent

* Basic operations are intuitive.
*Activities are easy.
*Students and teachers have no difficulty understanding instructions on use.
Content Elements

*Is content relevent to the purpose?
*Is it effective to provide learning or information to student/teachers?

Poor

*Content is irrelevant to purpose.
*Not effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.
Fair

*Content somewhat irrelevant to purpose.
*Somewhat effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.
Good

*Content fairly relevant to purpose.
*Fairly effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.
Very Good

*Content is good to purpose.
*Pretty effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.
Excellent

*Content is perfectly relevant to purpose.
*Effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.
Effectiveness Elements

*Evaluate effectiveness and usability.
*Teacher fit
*Student fit

Poor

*Effectiveness and usability is Nil-poor.
*No teacher fit.
*No student fit.
Fair

*Effectiveness and usability is fair.
*Fair teacher fit.
*Fair student fit.
Good

*Effectiveness and usability good.
*Good teacher fit.
*Good student fit.
Very Good

*Effectiveness and usability is very good.
*Very good teacher fit.
*Very good student fit.
Excellent

*Effectiveness and usability is excellent.
*Excellent teacher fit.
*Excellent student fit.



Keywords:
  • App, criteria, rubric, media, website, assessment, education, multimedia, learning

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16