iRubric: Evaluation of Multimedia/App or Website rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Evaluation of Multimedia/App or Website

This is a rubric I developed to assess multimedia/app or website for my Masters class MALL 551: Analysis and Evaluation of Multimedia in Education class.

Rubric Code: KX35947

By joydolly1

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: (none)

Multimedia/app/website Evaluation Evaluation and assessment of multimedia/apps or websites
	Poor Everything is poor, difficult, doesn't work and very slow. 1 pts	Fair Everything is Hard, slow or never works. 2 pts	Good Everything is good, but is lacking finesse 3 pts	Very Good Everything is almost perfect. 4 pts	Excellent Everything is Perfect 5 pts
Design/Technological Elements Color scheme Navigation hyperlinks load times	Poor Color scheme is poor. Navigation is difficult. Hyperlinks don't work. Loading time is very slow.	Fair Color Scheme is Fair. Navigation is hard. Hyperlinks almost never work. Loading time is slow.	Good Color Scheme is Good. Navigation is fairly hard. * Hyperlinks work some of the time. *Loading time is slow-moderate.	Very Good Color Scheme is very good. Navigation is Moderately easy. Hyperlings work most all the time. Loading time is Moderate-fast.	Excellent Color Scheme is Excellent. Navigation is easy and self explanitory. *Hyperlinks work all the time. Loading time is fast and easy.
Focus Intent and purpose Clear? Accomplishes Purpose Language learning goals clear Pedagogy of design and activities clear. Levels of interactivity avalaible for students.	Poor * Intent and Purpose is unclear. Does not accomplish purpose. Language learning goals unclear. Pedagogy of design and activities unclear. Levels of interactivity unavailable to students.	Fair Intent and purpose is vague. Vague accomplishement of purpose. Language learning goals vague. Pedagogy of design and activities vague. *levels of interactivite semi-available to students.	Good Intent and purpose is good. Accomplishment of purpose is adequate. Language learning goals adequate. Pedagogy of design and activities adequate.	Very Good Intent and purpose is very good. Accomplishment of purpose is very good. Language learning goals are very good. Pedagogy of design and activities are very good.	Excellent Intent and purpose is excellent. Accomplishment of purpose is excellent. Language learning goals are excellent. Pedagogy of design and activities are excellent.
Activities What are the activities provided? Learning Theories?	Poor * Activities do not fit description. *Learning Theories Aren't understood.	Fair Activities are poorly developed. Learning theories aren't clear.	Good Activities need work. Learning theories are lacking some clarity.	Very Good Activities are very good. Learning theories are well understood.	Excellent Activities are Excellent Learning Theories very clear.
Fundamental Elements Are Basicd operations intuitive? Difficultie and ease of activities. *Students and Teachers have to read instructions or is it easily understood how to use.	Poor * Basic operations are not intutitive. Activities are difficult. Students and teachers have difficulty understanding instructions on use.	Fair * Basic operations are poorly understood. Activities are fair-difficult. Students and teachers find it fairly hard to understandinstructions on use.	Good * Basic operations are fairly intuitive, but need work. Activities are moderate Students and teachers have some difficulty understanding instructions on use.	Very Good * Basic operations are fairly intuitive. Activities are moderate-easy. Students and teachers have no difficulty understanding instructions on use.	Excellent * Basic operations are intuitive. Activities are easy. Students and teachers have no difficulty understanding instructions on use.
Content Elements Is content relevent to the purpose? Is it effective to provide learning or information to student/teachers?	Poor Content is irrelevant to purpose. Not effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.	Fair Content somewhat irrelevant to purpose. Somewhat effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.	Good Content fairly relevant to purpose. Fairly effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.	Very Good Content is good to purpose. Pretty effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.	Excellent Content is perfectly relevant to purpose. Effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.
Effectiveness Elements Evaluate effectiveness and usability. Teacher fit *Student fit	Poor Effectiveness and usability is Nil-poor. No teacher fit. *No student fit.	Fair Effectiveness and usability is fair. Fair teacher fit. *Fair student fit.	Good Effectiveness and usability good. Good teacher fit. *Good student fit.	Very Good Effectiveness and usability is very good. Very good teacher fit. *Very good student fit.	Excellent Effectiveness and usability is excellent. Excellent teacher fit. *Excellent student fit.

Keywords:

App, criteria, rubric, media, website, assessment, education, multimedia, learning

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

Multimedia/app/website Evaluation Evaluation and assessment of multimedia/apps or websites
	Poor Everything is poor, difficult, doesn't work and very slow. 1 pts	Fair Everything is Hard, slow or never works. 2 pts	Good Everything is good, but is lacking finesse 3 pts	Very Good Everything is almost perfect. 4 pts	Excellent Everything is Perfect 5 pts
Design/Technological Elements Color scheme Navigation hyperlinks load times	Poor Color scheme is poor. Navigation is difficult. Hyperlinks don't work. Loading time is very slow.	Fair Color Scheme is Fair. Navigation is hard. Hyperlinks almost never work. Loading time is slow.	Good Color Scheme is Good. Navigation is fairly hard. * Hyperlinks work some of the time. *Loading time is slow-moderate.	Very Good Color Scheme is very good. Navigation is Moderately easy. Hyperlings work most all the time. Loading time is Moderate-fast.	Excellent Color Scheme is Excellent. Navigation is easy and self explanitory. *Hyperlinks work all the time. Loading time is fast and easy.
Focus Intent and purpose Clear? Accomplishes Purpose Language learning goals clear Pedagogy of design and activities clear. Levels of interactivity avalaible for students.	Poor * Intent and Purpose is unclear. Does not accomplish purpose. Language learning goals unclear. Pedagogy of design and activities unclear. Levels of interactivity unavailable to students.	Fair Intent and purpose is vague. Vague accomplishement of purpose. Language learning goals vague. Pedagogy of design and activities vague. *levels of interactivite semi-available to students.	Good Intent and purpose is good. Accomplishment of purpose is adequate. Language learning goals adequate. Pedagogy of design and activities adequate.	Very Good Intent and purpose is very good. Accomplishment of purpose is very good. Language learning goals are very good. Pedagogy of design and activities are very good.	Excellent Intent and purpose is excellent. Accomplishment of purpose is excellent. Language learning goals are excellent. Pedagogy of design and activities are excellent.
Activities What are the activities provided? Learning Theories?	Poor * Activities do not fit description. *Learning Theories Aren't understood.	Fair Activities are poorly developed. Learning theories aren't clear.	Good Activities need work. Learning theories are lacking some clarity.	Very Good Activities are very good. Learning theories are well understood.	Excellent Activities are Excellent Learning Theories very clear.
Fundamental Elements Are Basicd operations intuitive? Difficultie and ease of activities. *Students and Teachers have to read instructions or is it easily understood how to use.	Poor * Basic operations are not intutitive. Activities are difficult. Students and teachers have difficulty understanding instructions on use.	Fair * Basic operations are poorly understood. Activities are fair-difficult. Students and teachers find it fairly hard to understandinstructions on use.	Good * Basic operations are fairly intuitive, but need work. Activities are moderate Students and teachers have some difficulty understanding instructions on use.	Very Good * Basic operations are fairly intuitive. Activities are moderate-easy. Students and teachers have no difficulty understanding instructions on use.	Excellent * Basic operations are intuitive. Activities are easy. Students and teachers have no difficulty understanding instructions on use.
Content Elements Is content relevent to the purpose? Is it effective to provide learning or information to student/teachers?	Poor Content is irrelevant to purpose. Not effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.	Fair Content somewhat irrelevant to purpose. Somewhat effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.	Good Content fairly relevant to purpose. Fairly effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.	Very Good Content is good to purpose. Pretty effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.	Excellent Content is perfectly relevant to purpose. Effective to provide learning or information for student/teacher.
Effectiveness Elements Evaluate effectiveness and usability. Teacher fit *Student fit	Poor Effectiveness and usability is Nil-poor. No teacher fit. *No student fit.	Fair Effectiveness and usability is fair. Fair teacher fit. *Fair student fit.	Good Effectiveness and usability good. Good teacher fit. *Good student fit.	Very Good Effectiveness and usability is very good. Very good teacher fit. *Very good student fit.	Excellent Effectiveness and usability is excellent. Excellent teacher fit. *Excellent student fit.