iRubric: Lunch Line Life Hack rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Lunch Line Life Hack

Designing a Solution: Leaking Cup

Engineer It! Unit Performance Task

Rubric Code: K2WC366

By ktwoody1

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Project

Grade Levels: K-5

Engineer It: Lunch Line
	Outstanding 10 pts	Excellent 7 pts	Good 4 pts	Needs Improvement 1 pts
Problem & Research Clear Goal Statement	Outstanding Student carefully completes identifies the problem and clearly states how he/she will know that they've accomplished their goal. Student clearly states what factors contribute to the delays in the lunch line system.	Excellent Student completes all steps in the brainstorming process. 1 - Problem defined. 2 - Steps in design process are noted. 3 - Solution is identified as solved or not solved. If not solved, suggested design changes are noted, but is not easily understood.	Good Student completes some steps in the brainstorming process. 1 - Problem defined. 2 - Steps in design process are noted. 3 - Solution is identified as solved or not solved. If not solved, suggested design changes are noted, but it is incomplete.	Needs Improvement Student does not complete all steps in the brainstorming process. 1 - Problem is not defined. 2 - Steps in design process are noted, but incomplete. 3 - Solution is identified as solved or not solved. If not solved, suggested design changes are incomplete or missing.
Brainstorm Identify factors and ways to address them.	Outstanding Student offers two or more ideas for improving each factor causing the delays.	Excellent Listened to teacher during verbal instructions and procedures. Followed design process for the most part. Needed reminding only once.	Good Listened to teacher during verbal instructions and procedures. Partly followed design process, but needed reminding two or more times.	Needs Improvement Did not listen to teacher during verbal instructions and procedures. Did not follow design process. Did not listen to reminders.
Criteria & Constrains Criteria (ie: Needs) and Constraints (ie: Time, Budget, Training)	Outstanding Student creates a clear Criteria and Constraints chart listing at least three criteria and restraints for this particular project.	Excellent Student creates a procedure list that provides most data relevant steps necessary to follow the design.	Good Student provides steps to follow during the design process, but it is incomplete.	Needs Improvement Student procedures are incomplete or difficult to interpret.
Plan & Design Detailed diagram with explanatory text	Outstanding Student carefully makes a plan (3 questions on page 2 of worksheet). Student designs and draws a diagram that shows how the lunch system looks and operates.	Excellent	Good	Needs Improvement One student took over designing and implementing the experiment allowing little input from team member(s). One team member is bossy. ----- The other team member allowed partner to take over, did not offer help, or help was denied and did not stand up for self.
Evaluate Test the design (hypothetically with friends or principal) and Identify improvements	Outstanding Student asks two friends or the principal to test their design. Student takes notes as to how well the design works, what could be improved, how you would know. If something could be improved, how would you accomplish that.	Excellent Student analyzes how the procedure could be changed to yield relevant data if repeated but is difficult to interpret. Procedure is detailed enough to be replicated by others.	Good Student analyzes how the procedure could be changed to yield relevant data if repeated but is incomplete or difficult to interpret. Procedure is not detailed enough to be replicated by others.	Needs Improvement Student does not attempt to analyze the procedure for improvement.
Mechanics	Outstanding Writing is neat and easy to read. Contains less than 3 spelling or grammar errors Final submission includes both Hand Out and Design.	Excellent	Good	Needs Improvement

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Discuss this rubric