iRubric: Spanish Video Project : LOS VERBOS REFLEXIVOS rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Spanish Video Project : LOS VERBOS REFLEXIVOS

Rubric Code: K2W4WBW

By kkordonez

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Foreign Languages

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Reflexive Verbs Video
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 6 pts	Good 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts	Score (N/A)
Storyboard	Poor Storyboard is not done or it is so incomplete that it could not be used as a general guide. Storyboard reflects very little planning.	Fair Storyboard has glaring omissions in scene planning. There are some sketches, and notes on titles, transitions, special effects, sound, etc. Storyboard reflects attempts at planning and organization for the project.	Good Storyboard is relatively complete with sketches for most scenes, and notes on titles, transitions, special effects, sound, etc. Storyboard reflects attempts effective planning and organization for the project.	Excellent Storyboard is complete with names, goal, description, sketches for each scene, detailed notes on titles, transitions, special effects, sound, etc. Storyboard reflects outstanding planning and organization for the project.	Score
Script	Poor There is no final/corrected script for class/ video. Draft with suggestions /corrections was not turned in.	Fair Script has s few major flaws. It is not always clear what the students are to say and do. Script shows an attempt at planning, but seems incomplete.	Good Script is mostly complete. It is clear what each student will say and do.	Excellent Script is complete and it is clear what each student will say and do.	Score
Content	Poor The project has a focus, but may stray from it at times. There is an organizational structure, though it may not be carried through in a consistent manner. There may be errors or inconsistencies. Less than adequate evidence of student learning and efforts are reflected in the project.	Fair There is focus that is maintained throughout the project. The project presents information in an accurate and organized manner that can be understood by the intended audience. Adequate evidence of student learning and efforts are reflected in the project.	Good The project has a clear focus related to the topic and one or more of the following elements; shows notable insight or understanding of the topic. Evidence of student learning and efforts are reflected in the project.	Excellent The project has a clear focus related to the topic and one or more of the following elements; reflects research and shows notable insight and understanding of the topic. Excellent evidence of student learning and efforts are reflected in the project.	Score
Vocabulary	Poor Students use only basic vocabulary with possible use of first language.	Fair Students use vocabulary sufficient to express needs and feelings and retell or respond in familiar contexts with limited or no use of first language.	Good Students use sufficient vocabulary to communicate in most social and academic contexts.	Excellent Students use a varied and descriptive language, possibly including native-like phrasing and/or idiomatic expressions.	Score
Pronunciation and Fluency	Poor Student mumbles or cannot be understood. Several words/phrases are mispronounced and simple sentences are used.	Fair Student speaks clearly and distinctly (90-85%) of the time. Use of fluent connected speech, occasionally disruptive by search of correct form of expression.	Good Student speaks clearly and distinctly (96-91%) of the time. Some fluent connected speech.	Excellent Students speaks clearly and distinctly all (100-97%) of the time. Native-like flow speech.	Score
Grammar	Poor Grammar structure in sentences is often poor.	Fair Grammar structure is sufficient, but there are 4 to 5 mistakes.	Good Students use different grammar structures, but there are 2 or 3 mistakes.	Excellent Students use appropriate tenses, pronouns, gender and number agreement, negations, articles, prepositions and adjectives.	Score
Originality	Poor Uses other people's ideas, final product not creative.	Fair Use other people's ideas and there is little evidence of original thinking.	Good Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights.	Excellent Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive.	Score
Technical Elements & Requirements	Poor The camera work is choppy and the scenes are blurry or panning is too fast. Sound and visual contain significant distortion. Technical difficulties seriously interfere with the viewer's ability to see, hear, or understand content. CAPTIONS NOT included.	Fair The camera work may be choppy or panning is too fast. Sound and visuals may have some distortion, but it doesn't distract the viewer. There are some technical problems, but the viewer is able to follow the presentation. Title/opening or credits missing.	Good The camera work is generally smooth. Sound and visuals are mostly distortion free. Titles and sentences are mostly legible. There are few technical problems. Requirements are met.	Excellent The camera work is smooth. Sound and visuals are distortion free. Titles/ credits and captions are legible. There are few technical problems, and none of a serious nature. All requirements are met and exceeded.	Score
Class Participation during planning ______________/10 pts
Peer Evaluation _______________/10 pts.

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric