Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Advertisement Analysis Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Advertisement Analysis Rubric
Advertisement Analysis Rubric
For this assignment you will demonstrate your analytical skills by critically analyzing the specific appeal in the print advertisement attached. Although you will undoubtedly use some description in your essay, analysis is the objective. Look beyond to what is shown to why it is there and what it means.
Rubric Code:
K22AB4W
By
bratteberry
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Advertisement Analysis
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Introduction and Conclusion
10 pts
Excellent
Intro well-developed, creates interest, and establishes purpose. Title shows thought and creativity. Conclusion effectively and originally wraps up the essay.
Good
One of the following may be missing from intro: product's name, manufacturer, magazine's name or date of publication. Intro is complete. Title is adequate and interesting.
Fair
More than one of the following may be missing.<BR>
Either product's name, manufacturer, magazine's name or date of publication may be missing from intro. Introis adequate but fails to create interest in essay. Title is mundane,but accurate.
Poor
Thesis may be missing or inaccurate. More than one of the following is missing from intro: product's name, manufacturer, magazine's name or date of publication. Intro is rudimentary. Title may be missing or is perfunctory.
Thesis
10 pts
Excellent
Thesis easy to identify; makes a mature and sophisticated analytical claim that would not be immediately obvious to the reader; clear, well-developed, and specific. Evolves as essay progresses.
Good
Thesis makes an analytical claim that would not be immediately obvious to the reader; clear, well-developed, and specific.
Fair
Thesis attempts to make an analytical statement but might lack focus, development, specificity. Might state the obvious.
Poor
Thesis missing or difficult to identify; might be inaccurate.
Quality of Analysis
25 pts
Discussion of appeals
Excellent
Analysis of appeals is accurate and goes beyond the surface to cultural/social criticism. Discussion is thorough and insightful. Examples from the visual text provide a complete picture that sets the stage for the analysis. Target audience is identified and supported. The analysis is supported by textual examples.
Good
Analysis of appeals is accurate and attempts to go beyond the surface to cultural/social criticism. Discussion is thorough but may not completely convince. Examples from the visual text provide a complete picture that sets the stage for the analysis. Target audience is identified and supported. The analysis is supported by textual examples.
Fair
Analysis of appeals is somewhat accurate. Discussion is somewhat complete but might not scratch the surface, may seem mechanical. Target audience may or may not be identified and supported.
Poor
Analysis of appeals shows some misunderstanding. Discussion is brief. Target audience may be misidentified or not identified. No support given.
Organization/Paragraphing
20 pts
Excellent
All paragraphs are well organized and easy to understand. Each contains a sophisticated topic sentence and transitions. All sentences within the paragraph concisely and effectively work to support both the paragraph's and thesis's claims.
Good
Most ideas are thought out and organized for the reader. Each paragraph contains a topic sentence and transition, although some may seem formulaic. Most sentences within the paragraph work to support both the paragraph's and thesis's claims.
Fair
Some ideas are thought out and organized for the reader, but more development may be needed. There is an effort to create topic sentences and transitions, although this might not always be consistent. There is some connection between thesis and paragraphs.
Poor
Ideas may be somewhat jumbled and hard to follow. Paragraphs may not begin with topic sentences nor end with transitions. There is not a clear connections between paragraphs and thesis.
Connection to Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
15 pts
Excellent
Language is precise, mature, original, and avoids cliché. Uses a variety of sentence structures.
Good
Language is precise. Uses a variety of sentence structures.
Fair
Language imprecise but appropriate. Variety of sentence structures but some awkward or unclear and might impede reader's comprehension.
Poor
Language is imprecise, clichéd. Sentences lack variety, awkward or unclear, or poorly constructed. Often impedes reader's comprehension.
Grammar and Mechanics
15 pts
Excellent
Essay is relatively free of grammatical errors.
Good
Contains few errors in spelling, punctuation, mechanics. Any errors seem to reflect careless proofreading. Few, if any, major errors.
Fair
Occasional major and/or frequent minor errors. Errors might hinder reader’s comprehension.
Poor
Contains frequent, severe major and/or minor errors grammar or mechanics. Errors hinder reader’s comprehension.
Format
5 pts
Excellent
Follows guidelines as listed on "Essay Formatting" with no errors. Meets or necessarily exceeds length requirement.
Good
Follows guidelines as listed on "Essay Formatting” with one or two errors. Meets length requirement.
Fair
No more than four formatting errors. Meets or approaches length requirement
Poor
Four or more formatting errors and/or does not meet length requirements.
Keywords:
Analysis Advertisement
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.