Skip to main content
iRubric: Advertisement Analysis Rubric

iRubric: Advertisement Analysis Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Advertisement Analysis Rubric 
For this assignment you will demonstrate your analytical skills by critically analyzing the specific appeal in the print advertisement attached. Although you will undoubtedly use some description in your essay, analysis is the objective. Look beyond to what is shown to why it is there and what it means.
Rubric Code: K22AB4W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Advertisement Analysis
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Introduction and Conclusion
10 pts

Excellent

Intro well-developed, creates interest, and establishes purpose. Title shows thought and creativity. Conclusion effectively and originally wraps up the essay.
Good

One of the following may be missing from intro: product's name, manufacturer, magazine's name or date of publication. Intro is complete. Title is adequate and interesting.
Fair

More than one of the following may be missing.<BR>
Either product's name, manufacturer, magazine's name or date of publication may be missing from intro. Introis adequate but fails to create interest in essay. Title is mundane,but accurate.
Poor

Thesis may be missing or inaccurate. More than one of the following is missing from intro: product's name, manufacturer, magazine's name or date of publication. Intro is rudimentary. Title may be missing or is perfunctory.
Thesis
10 pts

Excellent

Thesis easy to identify; makes a mature and sophisticated analytical claim that would not be immediately obvious to the reader; clear, well-developed, and specific. Evolves as essay progresses.
Good

Thesis makes an analytical claim that would not be immediately obvious to the reader; clear, well-developed, and specific.
Fair

Thesis attempts to make an analytical statement but might lack focus, development, specificity. Might state the obvious.
Poor

Thesis missing or difficult to identify; might be inaccurate.
Quality of Analysis
25 pts

Discussion of appeals

Excellent

Analysis of appeals is accurate and goes beyond the surface to cultural/social criticism. Discussion is thorough and insightful. Examples from the visual text provide a complete picture that sets the stage for the analysis. Target audience is identified and supported. The analysis is supported by textual examples.
Good

Analysis of appeals is accurate and attempts to go beyond the surface to cultural/social criticism. Discussion is thorough but may not completely convince. Examples from the visual text provide a complete picture that sets the stage for the analysis. Target audience is identified and supported. The analysis is supported by textual examples.
Fair

Analysis of appeals is somewhat accurate. Discussion is somewhat complete but might not scratch the surface, may seem mechanical. Target audience may or may not be identified and supported.
Poor

Analysis of appeals shows some misunderstanding. Discussion is brief. Target audience may be misidentified or not identified. No support given.
Organization/Paragraphing
20 pts

Excellent

All paragraphs are well organized and easy to understand. Each contains a sophisticated topic sentence and transitions. All sentences within the paragraph concisely and effectively work to support both the paragraph's and thesis's claims.
Good

Most ideas are thought out and organized for the reader. Each paragraph contains a topic sentence and transition, although some may seem formulaic. Most sentences within the paragraph work to support both the paragraph's and thesis's claims.
Fair

Some ideas are thought out and organized for the reader, but more development may be needed. There is an effort to create topic sentences and transitions, although this might not always be consistent. There is some connection between thesis and paragraphs.
Poor

Ideas may be somewhat jumbled and hard to follow. Paragraphs may not begin with topic sentences nor end with transitions. There is not a clear connections between paragraphs and thesis.
Connection to Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs
15 pts

Excellent

Language is precise, mature, original, and avoids cliché. Uses a variety of sentence structures.
Good

Language is precise. Uses a variety of sentence structures.
Fair

Language imprecise but appropriate. Variety of sentence structures but some awkward or unclear and might impede reader's comprehension.
Poor

Language is imprecise, clichéd. Sentences lack variety, awkward or unclear, or poorly constructed. Often impedes reader's comprehension.
Grammar and Mechanics
15 pts

Excellent

Essay is relatively free of grammatical errors.
Good

Contains few errors in spelling, punctuation, mechanics. Any errors seem to reflect careless proofreading. Few, if any, major errors.
Fair

Occasional major and/or frequent minor errors. Errors might hinder reader’s comprehension.
Poor

Contains frequent, severe major and/or minor errors grammar or mechanics. Errors hinder reader’s comprehension.
Format
5 pts

Excellent

Follows guidelines as listed on "Essay Formatting" with no errors. Meets or necessarily exceeds length requirement.
Good

Follows guidelines as listed on "Essay Formatting” with one or two errors. Meets length requirement.
Fair

No more than four formatting errors. Meets or approaches length requirement
Poor

Four or more formatting errors and/or does not meet length requirements.



Keywords:
  • Analysis Advertisement

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16