Skip to main content
iRubric: WRITING RUBRIC COMIL

iRubric: WRITING RUBRIC COMIL

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
WRITING RUBRIC COMIL 
A rubric that assesses students' use of the writing process.
Rubric Code: JX68599
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric The Writing Process
Five Steps of The Writing Process
  EXCELLENT

10 pts

VERY GOOD

8 pts

GOOD

6 pts

FAIR

4 pts

POOR

2 pts

Prewriting/Writing

First Step in the Writing Process

EXCELLENT

Detailed evidence showing time spent brainstorming, organizing (use of graphic organizers) and writing out ideas for this piece of writing.
VERY GOOD

Evidence showing time spent brainstorming, organizing (use of graphic organizers) and writing out ideas for this piece of writing.
GOOD

Some Evidence shows the use brainstorming, organizing (use of graphic organizers) and writing out ideas for this piece of writing
FAIR

Few evidence that shows time spent brainstorming, orgainizing, and writing out ideas for this piece of writing
POOR

Little to no time spent brainstorming, organizing and writing out ideas for this piece of writing
Drafting

Second Step in The Writing Process

EXCELLENT

Draft clearly includes many ideas that were brainstormed and well organized during prewriting
VERY GOOD

Draft includes many ideas that were brainstormed and organized during prewriting
GOOD

Draft includes some ideas from prewriting session. Evidence shows that student used prewriting to write draft as information from it.
FAIR

Draft includes limited ideas from prewriting session. An attempt was made to include the information from prewriting in draft.
POOR

Draft includes little to no ideas from the prewriting session. Little to no information from prewriting is evident in draft
Revising

Third Step in The Writing Process

EXCELLENT

Student made numerous changes to writing, changing/adding details and description to make writing more attractive to reader. Student met personal revision goal.
VERY GOOD

Student revision shows adequate changes made to content and ideas in writing. Evidence shows that student worked on personal revising goal. Details were added to enhance writing.
GOOD

Student revision shows changes made to content and ideas in writing. Some evidence shows that student worked on personal revising goal. Details were added to enhance writing.
FAIR

Student attempted to make changes to their writing, however the changes were minimal and focused on editing verses content and description presented in writing. Few changes were made based upon the student's revising goal.
POOR

Student spent little to no time revising. Little to no changes were made to piece based upon the class directions or student's revising goal. Student did not take peer revision seriously.
Editing

Fourth Step in The Writing Process

EXCELLENT

No errors were made in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation, including commas and apostrophes. Appropriate paragraphs used in writing.
VERY GOOD

Some errors were made in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation, including commas and apostrophes. Appropriate paragraphs used. Student spent ample time working on identifying and correcting editing errors.
GOOD

Few errors were made in spelling, capitalization, and punctuation, including commas and apostrophes. Appropriate paragraphs used. Student spent ample time working on identifying and correcting editing errors.
FAIR

Frequent errors made in spelling, capitalization, paragraphing, and punctuation, including commas and apostrophes. These errors make it more difficult to understand the message or meaning of the writing. Evidence in draft shows that student attempted to make corrections to errors.
POOR

Numerous errors in spelling, capitalization, paragraphing, and punctuation,including commas and appostrophes, found in writing. These errors make it hard to understand the meaning/message of the writing due to these errors.
Publishing

Fifth Step in The Writing Process

EXCELLENT

Final copy was typed and easy to read. All parts of writing - prewriting, draft, Revisig, editing, and any other notes needed were turned in with draft.
VERY GOOD

Final copy was typed and easy to read. All parts of writing were turned in but were out of order. OR Final copy typed and turned in on time but other parts of writing were turned in late.
GOOD

Final copy was typed and easy to read. Some parts of writing such as first draft, prewriting, etc., may be missing.
FAIR

Final copy was typed and easy to read. Many parts of writing such as first draft, prewriting, etc., may be missing.
POOR

Final copy not turned in on time. AND/OR More than one part of writing (prewriting, draft, etc) were not turned in with final copy.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98