Skip to main content
iRubric: Evaluation of Student Internship Presentations rubric

iRubric: Evaluation of Student Internship Presentations rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Evaluation of Student Internship Presentations 
Rubric Code: JCC3AX
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Internship Presentations
  Poor/Far Below Basic

1 pts

Fair/Basic

2 pts

Good/Proficient

3 pts

Advanced

(N/A)

Preparation

Poor/Far Below Basic

The student did not have a completed presentation.
Fair/Basic

The student did not have the presentation completely ready and was finalizing some things as class began and/or while other students were presenting.
Good/Proficient

Presentation was "almost ready to go". We had to wait for this student to copy the presentation on to the desktop.
Advanced

Presentation was "ready to go" when it was this student's turn.
Type of Internship

Poor/Far Below Basic

Did not communicate this information.
Fair/Basic

Presenter did not give a clear introduction of the topic of the presentation. Audience was confused.
Good/Proficient

Presenter gave a clear introduction of the topic. The audience for the most part understood the purpose of the presentation.
Advanced

Presenter gave a clear and concise introduction of the topic, so that the audience understood the purpose of the presentation.
Knowledge of Internship

Poor/Far Below Basic

It was not clear if the presenter fully grasped the topic. The description lacked coherence and ultimately only communicated a vague understanding. Schematics or visual aids did not improve the explanation, were difficult to read, or were inadequately produced.
Fair/Basic

The presenter seemed to have a pretty good knowledge of the topic. The description was difficult to follow at times, but overall was effective in communicating the main ideas. The visual aids contributed little to the presentation and it is not clear why they were chosen.
Good/Proficient

The presenters had mastered much of the relevant aspects of their topic and are able to give a coherent description.
I did not understand all of the terms used, but this did not detract from my overall understanding. Visual aids were helpful.
Advanced

It is evident that the presenter had complete understanding of the topic. The description was concise and stimulating. The visual aids (slides, physical props, white board, etc.) were cleverly chosen and improved my understanding of the topic.
Organization of Presentation

Poor/Far Below Basic

The presenter was not organized at all. There did not appear to be any sequence nor order to the information presented.
Fair/Basic

The presenter was unorganized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was unclear and confusing because student tended to "jump around" from topic to topic.
Good/Proficient

The presenter was organized in the delivery of this presentation. Information was presented in a logical, interesting sequence that was easy to follow.
Advanced

The presenter was extremely organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was easy to follow.
Evidence of Practice

Poor/Far Below Basic

Presentation was hastily prepared and showed little to no practice. Fidgeting and halting speech were so predominant that I could not make out what the presenter was trying to say. Speech was difficult to hear or halting at times as the presenter seemed to be thinking of what to say.
Fair/Basic

It is not entirely evident the presentation was practiced in advance, maybe once or twice. Pronunciation was clear and adequate; eye contact was sufficient to make me feel the presenter was talking to the room and not to the floor.
Good/Proficient

Presentation was well prepared and adequately delivered. Fairly good eye contact, some fidgeting and unnecessary motion, but not enough to distract from the presentation.
Advanced

Presentation was well prepared and smoothly delivered. It is evident the presenter practiced and refined this presentation. Pronunciation was clear and in complete sentences, practically devoid of “um…”, “ah…” and uninformative phrases such as: “sorta”, “kinda”, “you know”, “basically”, etc. Good eye contact made me feel the presenter was addressing me directly.
Responses to Questions

Poor/Far Below Basic

Answers were halting or inadequate.
Fair/Basic

The presenter could provide meaningful answers, but could not thoroughly explain the topic or presentation materials. Looked sheepishly at the floor instead of responding to all questions.
Good/Proficient

The presenter was able to answer questions directly related to their presentation, for example clarifying or explaining their slides when asked.
Advanced

Ability to answer questions demonstrated in-depth knowledge of the topic in excess of that contained in the presentation.
Overall

Poor/Far Below Basic

The presenter displayed little knowledge and understanding of the components of assignment, software, computers, etc. They did not effectively summarize their internship experience.
Fair/Basic

The presenter did not seem comfortable with the program or discussing their internship. They needed a lot of outside assistance in getting through the presentation.
Good/Proficient

A good presentation. The presenter demonstrated the ability to utilize the various features of the presentation software program, however, the presentation did not always keep my interest.
Advanced

An outstanding presentation. The presentation kept my interest and was among the very best in class.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16