Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Evaluation of Student Internship Presentations rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Evaluation of Student Internship Presentations
Evaluation of Student Internship Presentations
Rubric Code:
JCC3AX
By
cll0008
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Internship Presentations
Poor/Far Below Basic
1 pts
Fair/Basic
2 pts
Good/Proficient
3 pts
Advanced
(N/A)
Preparation
Poor/Far Below Basic
The student did not have a completed presentation.
Fair/Basic
The student did not have the presentation completely ready and was finalizing some things as class began and/or while other students were presenting.
Good/Proficient
Presentation was "almost ready to go". We had to wait for this student to copy the presentation on to the desktop.
Advanced
Presentation was "ready to go" when it was this student's turn.
Type of Internship
Poor/Far Below Basic
Did not communicate this information.
Fair/Basic
Presenter did not give a clear introduction of the topic of the presentation. Audience was confused.
Good/Proficient
Presenter gave a clear introduction of the topic. The audience for the most part understood the purpose of the presentation.
Advanced
Presenter gave a clear and concise introduction of the topic, so that the audience understood the purpose of the presentation.
Knowledge of Internship
Poor/Far Below Basic
It was not clear if the presenter fully grasped the topic. The description lacked coherence and ultimately only communicated a vague understanding. Schematics or visual aids did not improve the explanation, were difficult to read, or were inadequately produced.
Fair/Basic
The presenter seemed to have a pretty good knowledge of the topic. The description was difficult to follow at times, but overall was effective in communicating the main ideas. The visual aids contributed little to the presentation and it is not clear why they were chosen.
Good/Proficient
The presenters had mastered much of the relevant aspects of their topic and are able to give a coherent description.
I did not understand all of the terms used, but this did not detract from my overall understanding. Visual aids were helpful.
Advanced
It is evident that the presenter had complete understanding of the topic. The description was concise and stimulating. The visual aids (slides, physical props, white board, etc.) were cleverly chosen and improved my understanding of the topic.
Organization of Presentation
Poor/Far Below Basic
The presenter was not organized at all. There did not appear to be any sequence nor order to the information presented.
Fair/Basic
The presenter was unorganized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was unclear and confusing because student tended to "jump around" from topic to topic.
Good/Proficient
The presenter was organized in the delivery of this presentation. Information was presented in a logical, interesting sequence that was easy to follow.
Advanced
The presenter was extremely organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was easy to follow.
Evidence of Practice
Poor/Far Below Basic
Presentation was hastily prepared and showed little to no practice. Fidgeting and halting speech were so predominant that I could not make out what the presenter was trying to say. Speech was difficult to hear or halting at times as the presenter seemed to be thinking of what to say.
Fair/Basic
It is not entirely evident the presentation was practiced in advance, maybe once or twice. Pronunciation was clear and adequate; eye contact was sufficient to make me feel the presenter was talking to the room and not to the floor.
Good/Proficient
Presentation was well prepared and adequately delivered. Fairly good eye contact, some fidgeting and unnecessary motion, but not enough to distract from the presentation.
Advanced
Presentation was well prepared and smoothly delivered. It is evident the presenter practiced and refined this presentation. Pronunciation was clear and in complete sentences, practically devoid of “um…”, “ah…” and uninformative phrases such as: “sorta”, “kinda”, “you know”, “basically”, etc. Good eye contact made me feel the presenter was addressing me directly.
Responses to Questions
Poor/Far Below Basic
Answers were halting or inadequate.
Fair/Basic
The presenter could provide meaningful answers, but could not thoroughly explain the topic or presentation materials. Looked sheepishly at the floor instead of responding to all questions.
Good/Proficient
The presenter was able to answer questions directly related to their presentation, for example clarifying or explaining their slides when asked.
Advanced
Ability to answer questions demonstrated in-depth knowledge of the topic in excess of that contained in the presentation.
Overall
Poor/Far Below Basic
The presenter displayed little knowledge and understanding of the components of assignment, software, computers, etc. They did not effectively summarize their internship experience.
Fair/Basic
The presenter did not seem comfortable with the program or discussing their internship. They needed a lot of outside assistance in getting through the presentation.
Good/Proficient
A good presentation. The presenter demonstrated the ability to utilize the various features of the presentation software program, however, the presentation did not always keep my interest.
Advanced
An outstanding presentation. The presentation kept my interest and was among the very best in class.
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.