iRubric: Vigilante Poster Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Vigilante Poster Rubric

This rubric will be used to grade the Vigilante Poster.

Rubric Code: J985XB

By cdiorio18

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Vigilante Rubric
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Information	Poor The students had 2 or less of the following information on their poster: outlaw name, crime committed, town/state where crime was committed, reward money offered, and whether or not they wanted their outlaw dead or alive.	Fair The students had 3 or 4 of the following information on their poster: outlaw name, crime committed, town/state where crime was committed, reward money offered, and whether or not they wanted their outlaw dead or alive.	Good The students had all of the following information on their poster: outlaw name, crime committed, town/state where crime was committed, reward money offered, and whether or not they wanted their outlaw dead or alive.
Effort	Poor The students had 3 or less of the following information on their poster: a picture, 60 words minimum, other knowledge from Chapter 19, color, clean/neat lines, no folds/creases, and paper clipped the graphic organizer to the poster.	Fair The students had 4 to 6 of the following information on their poster: a picture, 60 words minimum, other knowledge from Chapter 19, color, clean/neat lines, no folds/creases, and paper clipped the graphic organizer to the poster.	Good The students have 7 to all of the following information on their poster: a picture, 60 words minimum, other knowledge from Chapter 19, color, clean/neat lines, no folds/creases, and paper clipped the graphic organizer to the poster.
Employability	Poor The students showed minimal team effort, they did not work well as a group, did not follow directions, but handed their project in on time. Points will be deducted if the project was not handed in on time.	Fair The students showed some team effort, sometimes worked well as a group, sometimes followed directions, and handed the project in on time.	Good The students showed maximum team effort, worked well as a group, followed directions, and handed project in on time.