Skip to main content
iRubric: Non-Profit Project FINAL PRESENTATION rubric

iRubric: Non-Profit Project FINAL PRESENTATION rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Non-Profit Project FINAL PRESENTATION 
Animal Video Project (Miss/Mr EnviroSci)
This is a rubric for the oral presentation part of a quarter-long marine science project.
Rubric Code: J49A5A
By erinallmann
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric CONTENT/INFORMATION
How well did you answer each of the following questions?
  UNSATISFACTORY

2 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

6 pts

ORDINARY

7 pts

SATISFACTORY

9 pts

OUTSTANDING

10 pts

Comments?

(N/A)

what is the problem?

Description of the problem your group sees as the most serious one facing our oceans.
UNSATISFACTORY

This question was not answered at all
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail, no supporting evidence.
ORDINARY

Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired. May or may not present supporting evidence.
SATISFACTORY

Question was answered in detail; had well-documented facts.
OUTSTANDING

This question was answered in exquisite detail, supported by verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level.
Comments?
why is this so important?

What is the relevance to us in Hawaii and/or why do we have to do something about it NOW?
UNSATISFACTORY

This question was not answered at all
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail, no supporting evidence.
ORDINARY

Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired. May or may not present supporting evidence.
SATISFACTORY

Question was answered in detail; had well-documented facts.
OUTSTANDING

This question was answered in exquisite detail, supported by verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level.
Comments?
Who/what is being affected?

what groups of organism/type of environments/ places on the planet are being worst affected and why?
UNSATISFACTORY

This question was not answered at all
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail, no supporting evidence.
ORDINARY

Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired. May or may not present supporting evidence.
SATISFACTORY

Question was answered in detail; had well-documented facts.
OUTSTANDING

This question was answered in exquisite detail, supported by verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level.
Comments?
What is being done?

Are there other groups working on a solution? What has been done to solve this problem?
UNSATISFACTORY

This question was not answered at all
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail, no supporting evidence.
ORDINARY

Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired. May or may not present supporting evidence.
SATISFACTORY

Question was answered in detail; had well-documented facts.
OUTSTANDING

This question was answered in exquisite detail, supported by verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level.
Comments?
What will you do to fix it?

Your solution. What is your group going to do (as specifically as possible) to fix this problem?
UNSATISFACTORY

This question was not answered at all.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail.

Lack of innovative idea.
ORDINARY

Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired.

Some evidence of original thinking.
SATISFACTORY

Original, believable idea explained in enough detail to understand.
OUTSTANDING

Fantastic idea, completely believable, innovative and original, explained in great detail in a way understandable at every level.
Comments?
Why is your solution the best?

what about your solution makes it better than what's been done before? Why is yours going to succeed where others have failed?
UNSATISFACTORY

This question was not answered at all.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

This question was answered, very briefly, no real detail, no supporting evidence.
ORDINARY

Question was answered adequately. Lacking in some detail, and leaving some to be desired. May or may not present supporting evidence.
SATISFACTORY

Question was answered in detail; had well-documented facts.
OUTSTANDING

This question was answered in exquisite detail, supported by verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level.
Comments?
OTHER CRITERIA
Other critera to be graded upon:
  UNSATISFACTORY

2 pts

NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

6 pts

ORDINARY

7 pts

SATISFACTORY

9 pts

OUTSTANDING

10 pts

Comments?

(N/A)

Creativity/Originality

How creative/original was the presentation as a whole? Was it entertaining?
UNSATISFACTORY

None of the presentation was original work.

AND

Presentation not engaging.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Presentation mostly non-original work.

OR

Presentaion not engaging.
ORDINARY

Some original work. Project shows lack of creativity and/or effort to be original.

OR

Presentation not engaging or entertaining.
SATISFACTORY

Mostly original work.

Presentation shows creativity and is engaging and informative.
OUTSTANDING

100% original project. Creative and clever, unique idea that was entertaining, engaging and informative.
Comments?
Depth of Detail/Accuracy

As a whole, how detailed was the presentation? Was the information presented accurate and in-depth?
UNSATISFACTORY

No real detail of information.
Information is both inaccurate and not supported.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Presentation lacked detailed information. Information inaccurate and/or not supported.
ORDINARY

Presentation was somewhat detailed. Some questions answered in detail, others lacking. Information accurate and supported.
SATISFACTORY

Presentation was detailed, all questions were answered in great detail and supported by verifiable, accurate facts.
OUTSTANDING

Entire presentation was in exquisite detail, supported by accurate, verifiable facts. Superb explanation understandable at every level.
Students went above and beyond required questions.
Comments?
Effectiveness/Use of time

How effective was the overall presentation? Did they stay within the 6-10 minute time limit? Was their presentation both informative and persuasive?
UNSATISFACTORY

Under 6 or over 10 minute time limit (by >1 minutes)

AND

Presentation not effective or persuasive.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

Under 6 or over 10 minute time limit (by <1 minute)

AND

Presentation not effective or persuasive.
ORDINARY

Under 6 or over 10 minutes long (by <1 min)

OR

Presentation not effective or persuasive
SATISFACTORY

Within 6-10 minute time limit.

AND

Presentation was mostly effective. Lacking in persuasion and/or information.
OUTSTANDING

Within 6-10 minute time limit.

AND

Presentation was effective; persuasive and informative.
Comments?
Citations

Were pictures/data/facts cited? Were they cited properly?
UNSATISFACTORY

no citations present.
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

1-2 citations cited properly

OR

More citations, but cited improperly.
ORDINARY

3-4 citations, most cited properly.
SATISFACTORY

5 citations, properly cited
OUTSTANDING

>5 citations, all cited properly.
Comments?



Keywords:
  • science biology project high school

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16