iRubric: Electronic Resource Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Electronic Resource Rubric

Evaluation of electronic resources that could be used in teaching

Rubric Code: J39W86

By land2009

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: (none)

Electronic Resource Rubric
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts
Subject Appropriatness
Educational Relevance	Poor Desired Topics are not covered, resource is barely relevant	Fair Desired Topics are scattered within the resource or not covered in required depth	Good Desired Topics are thoroughly covered.
Current Information	Poor Information is not updated regularly. Information is more than 10 years old.	Fair Information is updated at least once a year. Information is not older than 5 years old.	Good Information is changed as research is changed and updated regularly. Information is not older than 3 years old
Content	Poor The point of the resource is not clear and information is hard to obtain.	Fair Some helpful information, but not complete coverage of topic area.	Good The most up to date information put in a clear concise manner that makes learning easier. Really adresses what you were looking for.
Classroom Environment Suitability	Poor Resource is unsuitable and would have detrimental impact on the learning	Fair Suitable for use but some other external resources are required to complete learning activities and adequately cover content	Good All resources required are contained with the resource and it adapts easily to the classroom environment
Peer Interaction Suitability	Poor No Peer Interraction possible	Fair Group work possible, but not really clear and would require some adaptation	Good Flexible Group work options available, resource potentially provides specialised group tasks
Potential Bias
Ethnic Bias	Poor Ethnic Bias is discriminatory	Fair Ethnic Bias evident with some stereotyping	Good Ethnic Bias not evident
Gender Bias	Poor Gender Bias is discriminatory	Fair Gender Bias evident with some stereotyping	Good Gender Bias not evident
Social Bias	Poor Social Bias is discriminatory	Fair Social Bias evident with some stereotyping	Good Social Bias not evident
Inclusive	Poor No Consideration evident for students outside of the mainstream	Fair Some Consideration for students outside of mainstream to be included - eg text as letters allows text to speech conversion, as opposed to bit maps that don't	Good Examples of Inclusive education readily found throughout
Social Impact	Poor Generates unhealthy social impact discussion and thought	Fair Does not generate much social impact discussion, relatively neutral.	Good Generates healthy open social impact discussion that aides content coverage
Aesthetics
Appearance	Poor Monochromatic color schemes. No pictures. No clip art. Nothing to grab your attention.	Fair A few graphics and some color to make you want to look around.	Good Extensive pictures, graphics, and clip art to grab your attention and make you want to check out more on the site.
Ease of use	Poor Hard to move around website. Don't know what to do. Clicks take you to places you don't want to go. No links to other helpful information	Fair A few links to helpful information. Directions are easier to understand.	Good Every link is current and useful. Directions are very easy to understand. Several links to more information.

Keywords:

Bias, Pedagogical Design, Feedback,

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric