iRubric: Supreme Court Case-Presentation Only rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Supreme Court Case-Presentation Only

Supreme Court Case-Presentation

Supreme Court Case presentation Revised 4/25

Rubric Code: J25W65W

By michelletcarter

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Law

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Case Study Presentation
	Poor 0-6 points 0 pts	Fair 7-8 points 0 pts	Average 9-10 points 0 pts	Good 12-14 points 0 pts	Exemplary 15 points 0 pts
Met Assignment Crtieria The PowerPoint presentation should clearly explain the case, the background, and the final decision of the court.
Overall Performance The presentation is out of 30 points. Here is the breakdown of points:	Poor The student did not meet the expectations of this assignment. (<12)	Fair The student met few of the expectations of this assignment. (12-14)	Average The student did not meet all expectations set in the assignment. (9-10)	Good The student clearly understood the assignment and met the expectations. (12-14)	Exemplary The student clearly understood the assignment and exceeded the expectations. (15)
Case Information Requires a combination of information on the slides and information provided by the speakers.
Case Facts & Background	Poor Identifies & understands almost none of the basic information or lower court trials Failed to mention the LOWER COURT	Fair Identifies & understands few of the basic case facts and lower court trials Did NOT identify the Lower Court Decisions.	Average Identifies & understands some of the case facts and lower court trials	Good Identifies & understands most of the case facts and lower court trials	Exemplary Identifies & understands the case, the parties involved, the time frame, the lower court trials, and the reason it was heard at the Supreme Court.
Effects of Case	Poor Analysis was only provided for one of the three areas (nation, education, and U. S. Citizens)	Fair Marginal analysis of of the effects of this case in two of the three areas (nation, education, and U.S.Citizens)	Average Somewhat thorough analysis of the effects of this case in two of the three areas (nation, education, and U.S.Citizens)	Good Reasonably thorough analysis of each the effects of this case in two of the three areas (nation, education, and U.S.Citizens)	Exemplary Very thorough and insightful analysis of each the effects of this case in all three areas (nation, education, and U.S. Citizens)
Decision/Follow-up	Poor The final decision was not included.	Fair The final decision was included, but we were not told how the breakdown of the ruling	Average The final decision was included on the slide, but not mentioned in presentation.	Good The final decision was shared , including the tally of concurring and dissenting votes, but additional information was omitted: precedence; opinions authors.	Exemplary Explained the decision of the court, explaining the concurring and dissenting votes and who wrote the opinions.
Writing Errors/Layout	Poor The slides are difficult to read due to errors or misspellings	Fair Frequent errors or misspellings	Average More than occasional errors or misspellings that somewhat distract from the content	Good Occasional errors or misspellings that do not effect the meaning and content	Exemplary All slides are free of any errors
Design & Presentation	Poor The slides are poorly designed, confusing to read, and don't complement what the speaker is saying. Slides are confusing to the audience.	Fair Some slides are clearly designed, but most are confusing or confusing to the view due to layout or text. Slides are not numbered, and are not in chronological order.	Average Slides are somewhat clearly designed, but some are confusing to read or don't make sense in the presentation. Slides are not numbered, and/or mostly in chronological order.	Good Slides are designed clearly, but speakers put too much information directly onto slide rather than using slides to highlight. Slides are numbered, and mostly in chronological order.	Exemplary Slides are designed clearly. Speakers supplement slides with information, rather than just reading to the audience from the screen. Slides are numbers and in chronological order.
Oral Presentation Style Speaker rarely reads ______ Speaker reads too much______ Speaker totally read ______	Poor The speakers didn't seem to know more than what was already typed on the slides.	Fair Speakers were confusing to the audience. They seemed to know about the case, but struggled to make the information clear to the audience.	Average Speakers were somewhat clear in their presention. Hesitation and/or volume control issues made some parts of the presentation difficult to understand.	Good Speakers were mostly clear and usually knew what they were saying. Some hesitation or volume control issues occured.	Exemplary Speakers were clear and well-informed. When the teacher or audience asked questions, the presenter was able to reply with intelligent answers.

Subjects:

Business
Law

Types:

Discuss this rubric