Skip to main content
iRubric: Case Study Presentation rubric

iRubric: Case Study Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Case Study Presentation 
Case Study Presentation
A Rubric to grade Case Studies presented by Agribusiness marketing students
Rubric Code: J248268
By mfazla
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Case Presentation
3-25-09
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Satisfactory

1 pts

Poor

0 pts

Organization
20 %

Excellent

Presents findings and conclusions in an organized manner. Contains no mistake
Good

Presents findings and conclusions with some degree of organization.Contains 1 mistake
Fair

Information and graphics are placed haphazardly on the page.Contains 2 mistake
Satisfactory

Information and graphics are placed haphazardly on the page.Contains 3 mistake
Poor

The presentation is disorganized. Contains more than 3 mistake
Content Accuracy
20 %

- chapter
- case material
- test results
- tx implications
Excellent

Covers essential case material completely and in depth. All content throughout presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors. Returns to literature or evidence, as needed, to make point.Contains no mistake
Good

Includes essential & some non-essential information related to case. Content is mostly accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate or not fully developed - just repeated from book without explanation. Possibly includes 1 or 2 references or illustrations.Contains 1 mistake
Fair

Includes some essential case information. Lots of unexplained facts listed. The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. Vague connection to patho-physiology and case vital signs. Does not demonstrate clear understanding of topic. Contains 2 mistake
Satisfactory

Includes some essential case information. Lots of unexplained facts listed. The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. Vague connection to patho-physiology and case vital signs. Does not demonstrate clear understanding of topic. Contains 3 mistake
Poor

Includes little essential information from the case.
Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error. No relevant references or evidence. Includes some essential case information. Lots of unexplained facts listed. The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. Vague connection to patho-physiology and case vital signs. Does not demonstrate clear understanding of topic. Contains more than 3 mistake
Visuals
20 %

Excellent

All charts, pictures and illustrations are attractive and support the topic of the presentation. Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability. Includes some essential case information. Lots of unexplained facts listed. The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. Vague connection to patho-physiology and case vital signs. Does not demonstrate clear understanding of topic. Contains no mistake
Good

A few charts, pictures and illustrations are not attractive but all support the content of the presentation. Font formats have been planned to enhance readability. Includes some essential case information. Lots of unexplained facts listed. The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. Vague connection to patho-physiology and case vital signs. Does not demonstrate clear understanding of topic. Contains 1 mistake
Fair

All charts, pictures and illustrations are attractive but a few don't seem to support
the content of the presentation. Font formats have been planned to complement topic, but may be a little difficult to read. Includes some essential case information. Lots of unexplained facts listed. Contains 2 mistake
Satisfactory

All charts, pictures and illustrations are attractive but a few don't seem to support
the content of the presentation. Font formats have been planned to complement topic, but may be a little difficult to read. Includes some essential case information.Contains 3 mistake
Poor

Several charts, pictures or handouts are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation. Font formats make it difficult to read the material.Contains more than 3 mistakes
Spelling and Grammar
10 %

Excellent

Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
Good

Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical error.
Fair

Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors, but not misspellings.
Satisfactory

Presentation has 2 -3 grammatical errors, but not misspellings.
Poor

Presentation has more than 3 grammatical and/or
spelling errors.
Response to Questions
10 %

Excellent

Student presented the material with confidence, enthusiasm, proper voice projection, good eye contact, apppropriate language and clear delivery. Tolerated interruptions for questions and clarification with ease and incorporated new ideas into presentation. Contains no mistake
Good

Student presented the material but could have been more confident. Adequate preparation and delivery. Paused and tolerated interruptions for questions and clarifications, but did not incorporate new ideas into case presentation.Contains 1 mistake
Fair

Student had many difficulties presenting material. Some difficulty communicating ideas, due to voice projection, lack of preparation, or incomplete work. Thrown off of topic by interruptions for questions and clarification. Contains 2 mistake
Satisfactory

Student had many difficulties presenting material. Some difficulty communicating ideas, due to voice projection, lack of preparation, or incomplete work. Thrown off of topic by interruptions for questions and clarification. Contains 3 mistake
Poor

Student was unable to complete presentation before the class. Great difficulty communicating ideas. Poor voice projection. Little preparation or incomplete work. Questions and points of clarification were disregarded and/or incorrectly answered. Contains more than 3 mistakes



Keywords:
  • Case Study Presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16