Skip to main content
iRubric: PACE PBL Rubric

iRubric: PACE PBL Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
PACE PBL Rubric 
Use the following criteria to guide your thinking and creating as you answer an essential question that is important to you and align that work to the standards. This rubric works in conjunction with the PBL Portfolio and can be used for anything from independent book projects to group endeavors across the disciplines.
Rubric Code: HXC48A9
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric PACE PBL Rubric
  Amazing

Exceeds the Standard

97 pts

There It Is

Meets the Standard

85 pts

Well . . .

Partially Meets the Standard

65 pts

Huh?

Does Not Yet Meet the Standard

50 pts

Essential Question

How well does your product answer the essential question you chose?
(MEDIA)

Amazing

Product demonstrates a comprehensive answer to one or more essential questions through compelling insights and rich evidence of thinking
There It Is

Product demonstrates a complete answer to one or more essential questions through relevant insights and evidence of thinking
Well . . .

Product demonstrates an incomplete answer to an essential question; would be improved by more insights and evidence of thinking
Huh?

What's an essential question thingy? I made a timeline and glued it to a poster. That's what I was supposed to do. Right?
Standards Demonstrated

How well does the product demonstrate the standards you proposed to demonstrate?
(VARIES)

Amazing

Product exceeds the proposed standard (see feedback for flattery)
There It Is

Product meets the proposed standard (see feedback for ways to improve)
Well . . .

Product partially meets the proposed standard (see feedback for ways to improve)
Huh?

Um. See... there are these things called standards....
Resources

How well have you documented the research, referencing, and outside resources used to complete your project? (REFERENCE)

Amazing

All sources effectively documented using accurate MLA/APA formatting
There It Is

Sources documented using MLA/APA formatting with one minor discrepancy
Well . . .

Sources documented using MLA/APA formatting with several minor discrepancies or one major discrepancy
Huh?

Sources not documented using MLA/APA format
Professional Quality

How professional does your product look in terms of MUGS and aesthetic (looks) quality?
(MUGS)

Amazing

Product is virtually free of errors and needs for improvement
There It Is

Product demonstrates one minor error and/or one minor need for improvement
Well . . .

Product demonstrates one significant error and/or one significant need for improvement
Huh?

Spell chek is for wusees. At least I cut out the pictues after I printed them off. Whatever.
Project Proposal Form

How complete was your proposal form in terms of detail and pre-thinking?
(ACADEMIC INITIATIVE)

Amazing
There It Is
Well . . .
Huh?
Project Standards Form

How well have you described and justified how your work demonstrates the standards
(ACADEMIC INITIATIVE)

Amazing

Form demonstrates comprehensive post-thinking through an exhaustive amount of detail (Little more to be said)
There It Is

Form demonstrates effective post-thinking through a reasonable amount of detail (Your thinking is clear, though you could go further in your explaining)
Well . . .

Form demonstrates some post-thinking though there is a lack of details (Your thinking is sorta here. Sorta.)
Huh?

We have to actually prove that we learned something? Man... this class.. I thought we'd just watch movies and stuff...
Project Reflection Form

How well have you described the process, content, and outcome of your project? (WRITING)

Amazing

Form demonstrates comprehensive thinking and effective, detailed explanations featuring specific examples; writing looks like a polished draft virtually free of errors
There It Is

Form demonstrates relevant thinking and effective explanations featuring specific examples; writing looks like a finished draft with no more than one or two surface errors
Well . . .

Form demonstrates some thinking and some explanation, but missing specifics; writing looks like a working draft with numerous surface errors
Huh?

Form demonstrates little thinking, little explanation, and virtually no specifics; writing looks like a rough draft with numerous surface errors that interfere with communicating your thoughts
Timeliness

How On Time Was Your Project?
(ACADEMIC INITIATIVE)

Amazing

Product is passed in on time or even a day earlier.
There It Is

Product is passed in one day late.
Well . . .

Product is passed in up to one week late.
Huh?

Product is passed in more than one week late.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98