Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Research Proposal Introduction rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Research Proposal Introduction
Research Proposal Introduction
The rubric is used to appraise the introductory research paper that specifies a topic of interest; identifies a problem; proposes a need for a study; formulates a research hypothesis, provides preliminary background data in the form of a review of literature, and the methods of the proposed research.
Rubric Code:
HXBCB58
By
intanliana
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Introduction
Excellent
Well formulated introduction based on facts with clear definition of key terms and concepts. Comprehensive review of the literature using quality evidence and specifically analyzes the research conducted by describing the individual studies and findings that support the thesis and focused problem.
Good
Fairly well formulated introduction that has with some definition of key terms and concepts. Comprehensive review of the literature using quality evidence but does not adequately analyze the research findings; simply reports on the literature.
fair
Introduction is not well constructed and little or no definition of key terms and concepts. Superficial review of the literature that does not describe the research findings; relies heavily on a few studies and uses poor quality resources for information gathering
Poor
Lacks a proper introduction. Superficial review of the literature that is poorly organized and lacks credibility based on the level of evidence and resources presented.
Problem Statement
Excellent
Very clearly posed statement of the problem and supported with high quality (strong) evidence.
Good
Fairly well posed statement of the problem that provides evidence but the evidence is not as strong as it could be.
fair
Statement of the problem is not clearly stated and/or lacks quality evidence to support the problem
Poor
Lacks a proper statement of the problem.<BR>
<BR>
Evidence presented does not support the thesis or problem statement.
Purpose of Study
Excellent
Very clearly stated purpose of the study that connects very well to the introduction and the statement of the problem.
Good
Fairly well stated purpose of the study that connects well to the introduction and the statement of the problem.
fair
Purpose of the study is not clearly stated and/or does not connect well with the introduction and the statement of the problem.
Poor
Lacks a purpose of the study statement or does not pertain to the introduction and/or the statement of the problem.
Research Hypothesis
Excellent
Well stated research hypothesis based on the purpose of the study.
Good
Fairly well stated hypothesis based on the purpose of the study.
fair
Stated hypothesis is unclear based on the purpose of the study.
Poor
Lacks a hypothesis or the hypothesis presented does not support the purpose of the study.
Methods
Excellent
Project is described in sufficient detail so that the reader could replicate the study. Subjects (number, type), measures, and Procedure are all described well. Statistical approach is thoughtful and correct.
Good
Details on subjects, measures, and procedure are all described in sufficient detail with one or two details lacking. Statistical approach is present but may be vague.
fair
Some details are missing from the subjects, measures, or procedure section such that the design of the study may be confusing. Statistical approach is present but confusing.
Poor
Paper lacks details, description of subjects, measures, and procedures. Statistical approach is missing.
Research APA style
Excellent
Sources are exceptionally well-integrated and they support claims argued in the paper very effectively. Quotations and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet.
Good
Sources are well integrated and support the paper’s claims. There may be occasional errors, but the sources and Works Cited conform to APA style sheet.
fair
Sources support some claims made in the paper, but might not be integrated well within the paper’s argument. There may be a few errors in APA style.
Poor
The paper does not use adequate research or if it does, the sources are not integrated well. They are not cited correctly according to APA style, nor listed correctly on the Works Cited page.
Style, Grammar, Mechanics
Excellent
Sentences are clear and varied in pattern, from simple to complex, with excellent use of punctuation. Excellent grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation.
Good
Sentences are clear but may lack variation; a few may be awkward and there may be a few punctuation errors. A few errors in grammar, spelling, syntax and punctuation, but not many
fair
Sentences are generally clear but may have awkward structure or unclear content; there may be patterns of punctuation errors. Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, syntax and/or punctuation. Could also be a sign of lack of proof-reading.
Poor
Sentences aren’t clear and Continuous errors
Keywords:
research proposal
Subjects:
Health
Psychology
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Health rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.