Skip to main content
iRubric: Research Questionnaire rubric

iRubric: Research Questionnaire rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Research Questionnaire 
Research Questionnaire
Complete the questionnaire by answering each question with a 100- to 150-word detailed response.
Rubric Code: HXB344X
By heba2fm
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Research Questionnaire
Enter rubric description
  Below Expectations

Student does not fully meet expectations for this assignment.

1.25 pts

Developing Proficiency

Student meets the minimum expectation for this assignment and is developing proficiency in this area.

2 pts

Proficient

Student meets the expectation for this assignment and is well-versed in this area to the point where proficiency is noticed.

2.5 pts

Conceptual Research

The student is able to articulate a general understanding of the primary function of research including terminology.
Below Expectations

Student does not adequately define the purpose of research as it relates to formal, academic writing, nor does the student articulate the expectations of formal research. Teminology is not adequately defined, and overall competency with the research process from an academic or professional perspective is absent.
Developing Proficiency

Student meets the minimum expectations for defining the research process (and terminology) from an academic and/or professional capacity. Experience with research is articulated to a manner that is consistent with university expectations.
Proficient

The student provides ample evidence that the research process is understood including appropriate use of vocabulary, examples, and experiences. The student is approaching proficiency in this area from a university perspective.
Research Tools

The student is able to articulate a general understanding of available university toolsto assist during the research process
Below Expectations

The student presents limited (or no) evidence of appropriate research tools that are available for use.
Developing Proficiency

The student presents adequate research tools that are available from the university that include: the library, ProQuest, EBSCO Host, CWE, WP, and other University of Phoenix sponsored tools.
Proficient

In addition to the University sponsored tools, the student provided examples of how these tools can be implemented to assist in the research process with great detail.
Personal Experience

The student provides a reasonable account of previous experience with the research process either in the academic setting or in the workplace
Below Expectations

The student presents little to no data to support experience with research in any capacity as a student or as a professional in the workplace.
Developing Proficiency

The student presents an adequate experience with research in the classroom as a student or as a professional.
Proficient

The student presents ample evidence of the use of research in the classroom and/or in the workplace to the point where proficiency is noted.
General Writing

The student is able to articulate thoughts, ideas, and experiences in a manner that is consistent with mechanics, usage, and formatting expectations for University of Phoenix students (i.e., APA 6th edition standards)
Below Expectations

While key thoughts and themes of the assignment were evident, the level of writing severely detracted from the message. Other factors such as formatting inconsistencies, word usage, tense errors, citations and references, and overall flow of the paper fall short of minimum expectations.
Developing Proficiency

While key thoughts and themes of the assignment are covered, some minor errors in formatting (i.e., consistent font, size, margins), word usage, tense errors, citations and references were noted that detracted from the overall message. With additional attention, these deficiencies can move the paper to a higher mark.
Proficient

Key thoughts and themes of the assignment were covered while noting few errors overall. Achieving a score in this area suggests that the paper is error free and would be used as a model example.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16