iRubric: Final Physiology Project (Part A-Draft) rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Final Physiology Project (Part A-Draft)

Please see the instructions posted on Blackboard. In order to receive the grade, each member of the group must be: -present in-class -prepared to showcase their project -discuss their specific contribution to the overall project -adhere to the instructions of the assignment. This assignment is due the first in-class session upon our return from the study week.

Rubric Code: HX88C87

By Nutrifitprof

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Health

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Final Physiology Project (Draft) Each member must be present in class in order to receive the grade. This assignment is due the first in-class session upon our return from the study week.
	Exceeeds Expectations (80-100%) Proficient Knowledge 2 pts	Above Expectations (70-79%) Good Knowledge 1.5 pts	Meets Expectations (60-69%) Basic Knowledge 1 pts	Below Expectations/ Minimum Pass (50-59%) Not Really Understanding Course Assignment 0.5 pts	Unsatisfactory (0-49%) Did not implement the required actions or elements. 0 pts
Follow Instructions -Topic and goal of the overall project -Use of the EA-tracker and/or approved tracking tool -Completion of steps -Individual Contributions on wiki postings 5 min video commercial	Exceeeds Expectations Depicts clear comprehension of completing steps and following instructions with sophistication and creativity. Each member of the group is confident and ready to discuss all aspects of project independently. Relates topic to course material.	Above Expectations Depicts clear comprehension of completing steps and following instructions. Almost everyone in the group is confident and ready to discuss all aspects of project independently. Relates topic to course material.	Meets Expectations Completed steps and follows instructions. Most members of the group are confident and ready to discuss all aspects of project independently. Relates topic to course material.	Below Expectations/ Minimum Pass Did not follow the instructions throughout. Students did not refer to draft expectations guideline. Missing some (1-2) key elements. Does not stay on topic.	Unsatisfactory Did not follow the instructions throughout. Missing several (2 or more) key elements. Does not stay on topic. Team is not prepared with material/handouts/draft and/or Professor's formal copy.
Content -A clear direction of the overall project. -Recommendations -Interactive Game/Activity	Exceeeds Expectations Included all content areas that will be included in the final with great detail. - What is the problem and why should we be interested in preventing this issue? -Students provide a detailed reflection and/or comparative analysis of EA tracker results are included. -Recommendations and other credible supporting facts from the scientific databases. -Creative and unique plan for the Interactive game	Above Expectations Included all content areas that will be listed, but content is lacking detail in less than two areas. Students provide a detailed reflection and/or comparative analysis of EA tracker results are included. -Recommendations and other credible supporting facts from the scientific databases. -Interesting plan for the Interactive Game/Activity	Meets Expectations Most content areas are listed. Some material (1-2 areas); material is lacking content. Analysis of EA tracker results are included.	Below Expectations/ Minimum Pass Did not include most content areas (2 or more areas); material is lacking content and detail. Missing the analysis of EA tracker results. Students worked on individual components separately which resulted in a fragmented and disorganized project.	Unsatisfactory Is uncomfortable with topic/information, provides weak or insufficient support and is able to answer only rudimentary questions. Missing the analysis of EA tracker results. Responses are weak. Member's of the group show inability to put project in motion. Professor seems to probe students with questions in order to see where they are going with the project.
Meeting Minutes -Includes: a table format with the title, date, time, and location of meeting, attendees and absentees, lateness. -Purpose of meeting -Allocation of duties Must use a table format with headings and subheadings, bold and/or colour coded for clarity and organization.	Exceeeds Expectations Detailed chronological description of all events. Assignments to team members are identified with detailed description and progress. Logical outline format or section headings are used to make the document readable. Tables, charts or lists are used where appropriate. Highlighted areas for special notes/or areas needing attention by Professor such as lateness, absenteeism or incomplete duties.	Above Expectations Chronological description of all events. Assignments to team members are identified with detailed description and progress. Logical outline format or section headings are used to make the document readable. Some tables, charts or lists are used where appropriate. Some highlighted areas for special notes/or area needing attention by Professor such as lateness, absenteeism or incomplete duties.	Meets Expectations Some action items are identified, but without clear description. Logical sequence is not apparent or neatly organized. Generic headings are used. The document is readable but some information could be reformatted and organized better.	Below Expectations/ Minimum Pass Format was unprofessional and not in a logical sequence. No headings or sections are shown. Several (2 or more) elements are missing.	Unsatisfactory Content was not descriptive and was not a clear reflection of the entire meeting. Attention to formatting is not apparent. Several (2 or more) elements are missing.
Spelling, Grammar & Word Mechanics -Formal copy of the draft -Advertisements such as pamphlets, brochures, PPt's, Posters/Board displays, and other visual aids.	Exceeeds Expectations No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.	Above Expectations Grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors are rare, less than 2	Meets Expectations Grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors are evident, more than 2	Below Expectations/ Minimum Pass Several grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors (2-5 errors).	Unsatisfactory Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors, more than 5. Multiple or repetitive errors interfere with readability of the document. Team is not prepared with material/handouts/draft and/or Professor's formal copy.
Creativity and Enthusiasm -Style and approach Positive and inviting attitude -Students have a sense of pride and want to share their findings. -Professionalism and respect throughout. -Friendly competition and uniqueness of project. What makes your project stand out above the rest?	Exceeeds Expectations Team is present, prepared and eager to promote their project to the class. Students maintain professionalism and respect to other groups while competing for the audience's attention to maintain interest on their project. Students are extremely well-rehearsed and knew one another’s information. Students raise the bar and bring a unique component to their project which creates a competitive edge. Significantly peaks the audience's attention.	Above Expectations All members of group/team are present in class and prepared for the presentation. Students are well-rehearsed and knew one another’s information. Presented information creatively but lacks uniqueness and/or create competitive edge. Mostly peaks audience attention and knowledge of topic.	Meets Expectations All members of group/team are present in class and prepared for the presentation. Member’s knew one another’s information. Presented information in a simple manner.	Below Expectations/ Minimum Pass Members are present but not prepared with material/handouts/draft and/or Professor's formal copy. Some were dependent on others to carry the load. Disorganized/ill-prepared and were unaware of one another’s information. No transitions and inconsistency Students improvised throughout the presentation.	Unsatisfactory Missing group member(s)/No teams present. Team is not prepared with material/handouts/draft and/or Professor's formal copy. Teams are disorganized. Member’s were unaware of one another’s information member's did not share the work equally. Almost all were dependent on others to carry the load which made it difficult to follow the direction of the project.

Subjects:

Health

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric