iRubric: Review and Analysis of Special Population Paper rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Review and Analysis of Special Population Paper

At least five(5) articles from professional social work journals about the selected population receiving group work treatment should be reviewed. Students must include, at minimum, the following information: • Identifying the Special Population,Elements Identified by the Research, Ethical Issues, Future Areas of Possible Research Students will cite references as appropriate in the body of the paper and use APA format. The paper should be at least five pages long, typed and double spaced.

Rubric Code: HX7658X

By mcarlson05

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Enter rubric title
	Poor 2 pts	Fair 5 pts	Good 9 pts
Grammar/ APA formatting	Poor Significant errors in grammar, sentence structure, flow of the paper. No works are cited, or cited improperly. Reference page has multiple errors or is missing. 3 or less sources are cited Paper is less than 3 pages long.	Fair A few minor grammatical errors. Some minor problems with sentence structure, word choice, how the paper flows, etc. Minor errors in APA formatting. 4 or less sources are cited. Paper is less than 4 pages long.	Good No grammatical errors. Sentence structure is strong and flows well. APA formatting is followed throughout the text of the paper as well as the reference page. At least 5 sources are used. Sources must be from professional social work journals. Paper is at least 5 pages long.
Identifying the Special Population	Poor Definition of special population is omitted or not supported by research.	Fair Definition of special population is stated vaguely or not supported by quality research.	Good Special population is identified as defined in research articles. This may include demographic information, history of the group, size of the group, etc.
Elements Identified by the Research	Poor Little to no discussion of strengths, challenges, stigma, prejudices, etc. Statements not supported by research.	Fair Minimal discussion of strengths, challenges, stigma, prejudices, etc. Minimal discussion of special issues or best practices. Statements not supported fully by research.	Good Strengths and challenges are discussed, including stigma or prejudice and how this relates to group work with his population. Special issues are discussed. Best practices discussed. All information backed up by quality research articles.
Ethical Issues/Poss.Future Research	Poor Ethical issues not considered in this writing. Future research not discussed or not supported by research.	Fair Ethical issues only partially explored. Minimal/partial discussion of possible future research, or statements not supported by research.	Good At least one ethical issue discussed. As supported by research, discuss possible future areas of research for this group.

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric