iRubric: Independent Research Project 1 rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Independent Research Project 1

1st Quarter Research Project

Rubric Code: HX7523A

By howlett1

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Great 4 pts
Research research of information pertaining to Canadian parliamentary system.	Poor Showed little or no effort understanding of the Canadian parliamentary system including leadership, branches of government and laws.	Fair Offered little explanation of the Canadian parliamentary system and did not including leadership, branches of government and laws.	Good Offers a thorough explanation of the Canadian parliamentary system including some information on leadership, branches of government and laws.	Great Offers an excellent explanation of the Canadian parliamentary system including leadership, branches of government and laws.
Research research and information pertaining to the country additional 2 countries of choice	Poor Showed little or no effort understanding of the countries parliamentary system including leadership, branches of government and laws.	Fair Offered little explanation of the countries parliamentary system and did not including leadership, branches of government and laws.	Good Offers a thorough explanation of the countries parliamentary system including some information on leadership, branches of government and laws.	Great Offers an excellent explanation of the countries parliamentary system including leadership, branches of government and laws.
Comparison compared the political system of choice country to the system here in Canada.	Poor Gave no comparison between the varying political systems.	Fair Offers little comparison between the varying political systems.	Good Offers a good comparison between the varying political systems.	Great Offers an excellent comparison between the varying political systems.
Work Cited	Poor Did not cite any works.	Fair Did not cite any works.	Good Some citations were included.	Great Citations were included.
Appearance	Poor There was no digital presentation to accompany the research.	Fair Presentation is not neat, no apparent thought has been given to text and graphics.	Good Presentation is neat, some thought and reflection has been given to text and graphics.	Great Presentation is neat, text and graphics are well planned and visually appealing.
Grammar	Poor Project was not in French and/or there more than six grammatical errors.	Fair Improper use of French vocabulary. Five to Six grammatical errors.	Good Proper use of French. Three or Four grammatical errors.	Great Proper use of French vocabulary. One to two grammatical errors.

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric