Skip to main content
iRubric: Archeology and Art History Activity rubric

iRubric: Archeology and Art History Activity rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Archeology and Art History Activity 
Activity-based rubric assessment of archeology and art history, lesson 1 on http://tahoart.weebly.com
Rubric Code: HB2BBX
By TammyHoppe
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Archeology and Art History
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Japanese Stab Binding Book

Poor

student does not use JSB book binding technique well

student was careless with JSB tools and tasks

student remains unfamiliar with names of JSB tools
Fair

student used the JSB book binding technique somewhat to make a handmade book

student did not always choose correct tools for JSB tasks

student is not familiar with every one of the JSB tools
Good

student used the JSB book binding technique very well to make own book

student worked safely and responsibly with bookmaking tools

student carefully copied demonstrated stitching pattern or carefully made up his or her own pattern

student knows the names of the JSB tools
Grid Reproduction Drawing

Poor

student made grid very poorly; lines are not straight or even

student did not model understanding of the grid technique for reproducing a drawing idea

student did not work and was not quiet during independent work time
Fair

student made grid pattern but it is uneven and does not show careful measuring

student partially used grid technique to reproduce a drawing idea

student did not work well independently during quiet work time
Good

student carefully made grid pattern on drawing paper

student successfully used grid technique to reproduce a drawing idea

student worked well independently during quiet work time
Research and Application

Poor

student did not make genuine predictions about archeology terms

student did not work in small groups on web quest for correct archeology definitions

student did not participate well at all in large group work, making learning very difficult for the class
Fair

student made some predictions about archeology terms

student worked poorly in small groups on web quest for correct archeology definitions

student participated somewhat in large group work, but interrupted some, making learning more difficult for the class
Good

student made relevant predictions about archeology terms

student worked well in small groups to do web quest for correct archeology definitions

student participated well is large group work, ensuring classmates had clear understanding of archeology terms
Archeology Dig Activity

Poor

student did not follow role responsibilities in mock archeology dig activity

student did not discuss with dig team about artifacts found and their possible meanings
Fair

student followed most of the role responsibilities in mock archeology dig activity but could have done much better

student discussed somewhat with dig team about artifacts found and their possible meanings but could have added much more
Good

student accurately followed role responsibilities in mock archeology dig activity

student discussed well with dig team about artifacts found and their possible meanings

student is familiar with the names of all relevant archeology terms and vocabulary
Reflections

Poor

student barely or did not write or make podcast about personal archeology dig proposal

student did not apply necessary steps of proposing an archeology dig

student's archeology dig proposal is not based on anything genuine or factual
Fair

student wrote or made partial podcast about personal archeology dig proposal

student did not apply all of the necessary steps of proposing an archeology dig

student's archeology dig proposal is not based fully on genuine facts and details
Good

student writes or makes podcast of personal archeology dig proposal

student accurately applied all necessary steps of proposing an archeology dig

student's archeology dig proposal is based on genuine facts and details





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98