iRubric: Theory Based Nutrition Education rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Theory Based Nutrition Education

BS in Dietetics and Nutrition students will develop a theory-based nutrition education plan as their group project.

Rubric Code: H57237

By dlgleg

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Health

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Theory Based Nutrition Education Pr Enter rubric description
	Poor D-F 1 pts	Fair C 2 pts	Good B 3 pts	Excellent A 4 pts
Step 1 4 pts Analyze issues and audiences to state program behavioral objectives	Poor 0 to 1 step task completed and 0-1 product derived. Does not demonstrate understanding of step.	Fair 2 step tasks completed and 1 product derived. May not be clearly identified and logical.	Good 4 of the 5 tasks and products are completed. They are clearly identified and logical.	Excellent All 5 tasks and products completed and logical.
Step 2 4 pts Identify personal mediators to achieve program behavioral goals.	Poor Group failed to identify mediators and to derive list for action/behavioral goals. No research is evident.	Fair Mediators were identified but not labeled as psycosocial or environmental. Did not derive a logical list of action/behavior goals. Little research is evident.	Good Mediators were properly identified but group did not derive list of action/behavior goals. More research necessary.	Excellent All mediators and goals were logically identified and supported by research.
Step 3 4 pts Select theory, philosophy, and components.	Poor Group failed to select appropriate theory, clarify philosophy, or determine program components.	Fair Group completed one task and did not properly select theory. Did not correlate program components with theory.	Good Group completed at least 3 of 4 requirements, but failed to document reasons for theory selection.	Excellent Grooup completed all components of this step and logically documented rationale for theory selection.
Step 4 4 pts State objectives for mediators	Poor Objectives not completed or not clearly stated.	Fair Objectives for both psychosocial and environmental mediators are not completed.	Good Objectives for both psychosocial and environmental mediators are completed but not clear.	Excellent Objectives for both psychosocial and environmental mediators are completed, clear, and measurable.
Step 5 4 pts Design Theory based strategies and activities for mediators.	Poor Activities not completed or not matched to mediators and/or theory.	Fair At least one activity is completed and matched to mediator and theory.	Good Activities are completed and matched to mediators but lack relevant theory and research.	Excellent Activities are completed and educational plans for sessions link mediators, objectives, strategies with theory.
Step 6 4 pts Plan evaluation	Poor There is no evidence for outcome evaluation, tools to measure inpact of nutrition education.	Fair Evidence for outcome evaluation noted, but lacks tools and /or plan to measure impact.	Good Outcome evaluation plans made, including process evaluation, but procedures not clearly defined.	Excellent Clearly defined plans and procedures for measuring outcomes.
Presentation 4 pts	Poor Paper is disorganized and difficult to follow. Oral presentation does not indicate involvement from all group members.	Fair Paper is neat and organized in some parts. Little evidence of entire group involvement.	Good Paper is neat and organized in most places. Evident that most group members were highly involved with project and decision making.	Excellent Paper is neat and organized in all areas. Evident that all group members were involved in project and decision making.

Subjects:

Health

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric