iRubric: Process Speech Grading Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Process Speech Grading Rubric

This rubric sets criteria for grading the Process Speech presentations.

Rubric Code: H4W6X9

By torrescarlos

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Communication

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: (none)

Process Speeches
	Good 5 pts	Fair 4 pts	Poor 2 pts	Very Poor 0 pts
Vocal Presentation 20 %	Good Student spoke clearly, articulated well, loud enough for everyone in audience to hear, slowly enough so that audience could understand and did not use any unneccesary pauses or mispronounced words.	Fair Student has a basically clear vocal presentation, with a few areas of mispronunciation, excessive use of filler words, rapid rate of speech, volume issues, etc..	Poor Student was very hard to hear, had very poor articulation, spoke much too quickly, took unneccessary pauses, etc... Vocal presentation made it very hard to understand the information being communicated.	Very Poor Student was impossible to hear, no articulation and impossible to understand information being communicated.
Physical Presentation 30 %	Good Student had good posture and use of gestures. Student maintained good eye contact with entire room during the speech.	Fair Student slumped over podium or leaned on table, had lots of unneccesary movement, or didn't use their hands for gestures, etc... Student had moments of eye contact with the audience, but spent parts of the speech focused on the outline, back wall, table, etc...	Poor Student did not make eye contact with the audience, had lot of extra movement, slouched, held hands behind back, etc... Their physical presentation distracted from their speech.	Very Poor No eye contact at all. Physical appearance made the presentation hard to follow and comprehend.
Extemporaneous Presentation 20 %	Good Student was able to explain the process conversationally, maintaining good contact with the audience throughout the speech, and only referring to the outline periodically.	Fair Student had moments of good explanation of the process, but relied on the outline more than necessary.	Poor Student read directly from the outline, maintaining very little contact with the audience during the presentation.	Very Poor No contact with the audience, a "one-man show."
Organization/Demonstration 20 %	Good Speech had a clear introduction and background information on the process, and had a clear conclusion. Speech explained all the steps in detail and in correct order. Demonstration was logical and done smoothly. It was obvious the presentation had been practiced.	Fair The process itself was clear, but needed a defined beginning and ending. The demonstration was not well coordinated with the speech. Student needed more practice.	Poor Speech had no background information, and no conclusion. The explanation of the process was missing steps, in the wrong order, and/or confusing for the audience. The demonstration did not coordinate with the presentation at all.	Very Poor No organization in demonstration. Not clearly explained and hard to follow.
Outline 10 %	Good Student included a title, general and specific purposes, and central idea at the top of the outline. All the steps of the process were included on the outline. Outline was typed.	Fair Student did not include general and specific purposes or central idea, and some steps may be missing. Outline was typed.	Poor Student included only a few bits of information about the process, with no title, or other information at the top. Outline was not typed.	Very Poor No outline/written form turned in.

Subjects:

Communication

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric