iRubric: Juvenile Law and Procedures Final Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Juvenile Law and Procedures Final Project

Sacramento County Juvenile Hall (YDF) Probation Aide Interview

Rubric Code: H3278C

By sjvcrubrics

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Enter rubric title Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Very good 4 pts	Outstanding 5 pts
Professional appearance Visual rating of interviewee	Poor Sloppy, dirty, clothes innappropriate for activity---appearance possibly offensive to interviewer.	Fair Put minimal effort into making a good impression relative to appearance, though not offensive to interviewer.	Good Acceptable appearance. Put some effort into proper selection of attire and grooming.	Very good Solid professional appearance. Clothing and grooming is fully appropriate for job. Males must have at least a tie.	Outstanding Impressive appearance reflecting professionalism and responsibility. Appearance of top level employee ready for any challenge. Coats and ties for males.
Manner and general communication Level of effectiveness of interviewee in communicating with interview panel	Poor Interviewee demonstrates either poor communication skills, a lack of interest, or a significant lack of confidence.	Fair Struggled slightly with communication. Needs practice in the interview setting. Had difficulty articulating thoughts in a clear, understandable manner. Eye contact was less than satisfactory.	Good Communicated in a satisfactory manner. While some improvement was needed, interviewee made a respectable overall impression with his/her ability to communicate.	Very good Interviewee was clear and understandable. Maintained solid eye contact.	Outstanding Interviewee was very impression in their manner of communication, reflecting a positive attitude and extreme professionalism.
Preparation for interview Enter criteria description	Poor Interviewee appeared to do little if any preparation and was unable to effectively answer questions that arose.	Fair Interviewee did some preparation for interview, but was not fully prepared for questions.	Good Acceptably prepared. Not embarrassed by own responses.	Very good Interviewee clearly did some research in advance and had a solid understanding of the department.	Outstanding Exceptionally well prepared. Seemed very comfortable with unique questions that arose and had a well rounded understanding of department and job assignments.
balanced understanding of systems	Poor Demonstrated virtually no understanding of any aspects of juvenile justice.	Fair Had a partial understanding of the juvenile justice system.	Good Had a solid general understanding of juvenile justice as it is related to the court system, institutions, and law enforcement/field supervision.	Very good Seemed to have a deeper understanding of juvenile justice systems.	Outstanding Interviewee was extremely knowledgeable in all areas of juvenile justice.
Enter Title Special interest/project discussion	Poor Interviewee was poorly prepared in reviewing area of special interest.	Fair Had done some work on special area of interest, but was less than knowledgeable.	Good Interviewee had an acceptable knowledge of area of interest, but nothing special.	Very good Had obviously done a considerable amount of research on special area of interest and was comfortable in discussing the topic.	Outstanding Extremely well versed on topic and was able to present it like an expert.

Keywords:

Student Interview

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric