iRubric: SNAP Auto Ethnography rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

SNAP Auto Ethnography

This assignment is worth a total of 50 points. 10 points for fulfilling the requirements of each concept. Be sure to answer all the questions in the prompt.

Rubric Code: H2X79A7

By chefjude

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

SNAP - Auto Ethnography
	Poor 2 pts	Fair 5 pts	Good 10 pts
Auto-Ethnography as whole	Poor Student briefly explained their ethnography but left out many important parts and explanations.	Fair Student showed a good understanding on their ethnography. Left out some details and explanations but over all showed a good effort.	Good Student showed a great understanding of their ethnography and seemed to have really grasped the concepts. Made minimal mistakes and included all of the necessary details.
Explanation of Meal Choices	Poor Student showed little to no understanding. Gave little to no insight on meal choices.	Fair Student showed understanding of challenges of meal choices on SNAP, and demonstrates some of the difficulties with the program.	Good Student explained in depth 3 or more challenges that came about from this exercise. Their paper clearly demonstrates an understanding of difficulty associated with living on $4.44 per day.
Explanation of SNAP Challenges	Poor Student showed little to no understanding. Brief or no presentation of challenges.	Fair Student gave a brief explanation of SNAP Challenges without explanation of how this impacts the lives of participants.	Good Student explained in depth SNAP challenges and how the program impacts participants. Student demonstrates an excellent understanding of the difficulties people face when on food stamps.
Explanation of Positionality	Poor Student showed little to no understanding of positionality.	Fair Student gave a brief explanation of their positionality but was unable to demonstrate how their positionality informed their response.	Good Student showed a great understanding of their positionality and gave concrete insight about how their race, gender and socioeconomic status impacted their response to the assignment.
Explanation of Broader Impacts	Poor Student showed little to no understanding of broader impacts.	Fair Student gave a brief explanation about broader impacts but didn't quite connect their experience while doing this exercise.	Good Student showed a great understanding of the broader impacts and included 3 or more points that linked the exercise to larger societal issues. Student demonstrated great insight on how SNAP policies can effect which opportunities are available to each person.