Skip to main content
iRubric: Individual Debate Evaluation rubric

iRubric: Individual Debate Evaluation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Individual Debate Evaluation 
Debate Evaluation
Evaluates the key components of an effective oral debate.
Rubric Code: H2WXB37
By cdsheldo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Individual Debate Evaluation
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Sufficient

2.5 pts

Poor

1 pts

Preparedness

Student has used allocated time to prepare, has notes, prepared rebuttals, stays focused on topic.
Excellent

Student is completely prepared and has obviously rehearsed. Stays on topic all (100%) of the time.
Good

Student seems well enough prepared but might have needed a couple more rehearsals. Stays on topic most (99-90%) of the time
Sufficient

Student is somewhat prepared, but it is clear that rehearsal was lacking. Stays on topic some (89%-75%) of the time.
Poor

Student does not seem at all prepared to present. It was hard to tell what the topic was.
Content and Organization

Minimum of 1 argument, understanding of the motion/topic, follows debate structure.
Excellent

Shows a full understanding of the topic, has 2+ arguments and is organized throughout speech.
Good

Shows a good understanding of the topic and basic comprehension of different aspects, has 1+ argument and a well organised speech.
Sufficient

Shows a basic understanding of parts of the topic with simple acknowledging different aspects, has 1 argument.
Poor

Does not understand the topic very well, argument is unclear and speech is unorganized.
Convincing arguments and rebuttals

Claim, evidence, impact
Excellent

Always (99-100% of time) uses convincing arguments, opinions based on facts and ties evidence back to their position. Rebuttals were clear, relevant and strong.
Good

Mostly (80-98%) uses convincing arguments.
Rebuttals could have been stronger, more relevant and/or clear.
Sufficient

Sometimes (70-80%) convincing, mostly sentiments.
Rebuttals were mediocre, lacking strength, relevance and/or clarity.
Poor

Is rarely convincing or presents mere sentiments, emotionally based opinions unsupported by facts.
Rebuttals were non-existent or poor quality.
Participation

Participated in the debate practice rounds and the midterm assessment.
Excellent

Full participation throughout the debate practice rounds, in preparation for the final round and during the final round.
Good

Good participation throughout the debate practice rounds, in preparation for the final round and during the final round.
Sufficient

Participated half the time during debate practice rounds, in preparation for the final round and during the final round.
Poor

Participated about 20% of the time.



Keywords:
  • Oral presentation debate discussion evaluation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98